[–] nomoss 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I know why @paulsperry_
It’s because I asked IG Atkinson about his “investigation” into the contacts between Schiff’s staff and the person who later became the whistleblower. The transcript is classified “secret” so Schiff can prevent you from seeing the answers to my questions
[–] MolochHunter 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
he would also have been subject to questions about standard procedures , such as those against 3rd party hearsay, and the whistleblower needing to run the complaint through the IG first before taking it outside of the intelligence community
iether they didnt (crooked impeachment process) or they did (crooked IG)
[–] etmb44 1 point 3 points 4 points (+4|-1) ago
While the rules Schiff is operating under allow him to prohibit members from revealing the content of testimony taken in depositions, Republicans likely will be able to call witnesses before the judiciary committee when considering articles of impeachment. If so, they can call Ratcliffe and others and question them about the depositions. Schiff's ban on revealing content can not prevent them from answering questions asked by a different committee. There will then be no ethics violation.
[–] WilhelmVonDoobiest 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
Schiff should be put up against a wall. A traitor, treasonous scumbag. An enemy of the People and vile dangerous invalid with evil, hateful intentions.