0
2

[–] Ghetto_Shitlord 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

"In my deveelipemnt experience."

There is the problem. It's not about you, it's about the customer, and what they want. Convertible laptops are the fastest growing segment. I can't sell a laptop to a business customer these days without touch. Non touch is legacy at this point.

Linux shot itself in the foot by not courting the services that are widely used to their platform. They could easily contact MS and work out a deal to get first party access. Thwy won't, they act like they dont want customers at this point.

"Don't vendor lock yourself.

Again, the wrong attitude. I like the service, and I'm not going to switch because you dont support it. It's availa le on everything but Linux, THEY shot themselves not making a deall for 1st party access.

If you're going to play, play to win, they clearly aren't.

0
1

[–] Master_Foo 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You are expecting some megalithic organization to make your decisions for you and, thus, you vendor lock yourself into that solution. You can't blame Linux for that, you can only blame yourself.

You bought into OneDrive when there are plenty of remote storage options that are platform agnostic. That's on you.

Unix Philosophy is one of personal responsibility. You can do anything you want to do with it. Want touch? You have touch. You are just too retarded to try it. I had a touch screen laptop. It worked perfectly fine. I never used it, because touch is retarded. But, I suppose it was useful for playing Civ V occasionally.

Listen, dude. You are not complaining about how Linux can't do XYZ. You are complaining about how YOU are too lazy to take personal responsibility for yourself.

0
0

[–] B3bomber ago 

Dude, you failed reading comprehension. He said customers.

Linux treats people who want to use it like this: you want that to work? Code, compile, etc. it yourself.