0
1

[–] 21321705? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Attention: Ruth Bader Ginsburg has left the building.

Bug is a euphamism for malignant tumor.

1
24

[–] 21321728? 1 point 24 points (+25|-1) ago  (edited ago)

RBG is ded.

Her double quit.

Now for a huge funeral.

0
9

[–] 21322358? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

You heard the msm, she just had a sore tummy, she's fine!....🍿🍿

0
2

[–] 21326898? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

She had a problem with her bug.

0
1

[–] 21328551? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Gar B G

0
3

[–] 21322903? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Nice opportunity for the Dems to drag out impeachment for an extra week.

0
6

[–] 21323046? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I agree that we’re seeing an rbg impersonator. I disagree that she should get a big funeral. If she does get a funeral, it would be the perfect time to point out that Podesta had Scalia murdered most likely at Hillary’s command. Scalia’s murder was swept under the rug.

0
1

[–] 21326236? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

But McCain and Bush had beautiful funerals...that dem ape as well

0
1

[–] 21323808? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I figured it would be Carter.

0
1

[–] 21326281? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hey - I'm OK with them sharing this momentous occasion. It's not like it has to be one OR the other!

0
13

[–] 21321961? 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago 

Stomach bug= Code Brown

0
0

[–] 21323641? ago 

This comment was linked from this anonymous v/QRV comment.

Posted automatically (#73558) by the SearchVoat.co Cross-Link Bot. You can suppress these notifications by appending a forward-slash(/) to your Voat link. More information here.

0
1

[–] 21326691? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

LMAO.

0
1

[–] 21329758? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

0
8

[–] 21321963? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

r . b . g

b . e . e

d . e . d

0
2

[–] 21322668? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That could be a rapper group!

1
3

[–] 21322755? 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

w . w . g

o . n . e

w . g . a

0
2

[–] 21323351? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

r . b . g . w . w . g

b . e . e . o . n . e

d . e . d . w . g . a

0
7

[–] 21322081? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Tick Tock

Another SC pick would put the lefty libs into meltdown.

0
2

[–] 21322693? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd like to see them all so unhappy that they never vote again.

0
2

[–] 21324890? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Can we have a Protestant this time? Is that allowed?

1
0

[–] 21326921? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Aka: heretic.

0
9

[–] 21322162? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

Being dead tends to make one absent.

0
1

[–] 21322304? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Not when you are on the Supreme Court.

Shit, prisoner transfer, to and from jail and court, registers electronic fingerprinting at each transaction point. We must do the same with public officials, especially when they scream, "It's demeaning! Don't you trust me??"

0
0

[–] 21322759? ago 

0
9

[–] 21322188? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

She had pancreatic cancer, right? The cancer no one survives?

The sham impeachment may be the final attempt at stopping another SC justice.

0
13

[–] 21322337? 0 points 13 points (+13|-0) ago  (edited ago)

She had (1) lung cancer, (2) colon cancer, (3) pancreatic cancer, (4) lung cancer again.

0
4

[–] 21322380? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That's a good case of death if I ever saw it

0
1

[–] 21323620? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

these people are sick

0
2

[–] 21325185? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Q has suggested the DS is using experimental drugs hidden from the public that work, on this fuckstick.

0
1

[–] 21330541? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Alex Trebeck isn’t faring well with his pancreatic cancer

0
4

[–] 21322864? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

article: "Ginsburg, a four-time cancer survivor,"

me: SURE.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

1
0

[–] 21322378? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Lol why does that matter

1
0

[–] 21322398? 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Some rule which doesn't allow SC positions to be filled around an election year... obviously only applies to conservatives.

0
8

[–] 21322435? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Trump can nominate RBG's sucessor, and the Senate can confirm before the election.

Dems would go spastic. The Dem house would try to impeach Trump for making a legitimate SC appointment, as is his duty. How would the Senate impeach Trump for a valid SC appointment that they themselves ratified ???? Oh, this is soooo satisfying !!

0
4

[–] 21322571? [S] 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

He can. Turtle will confirm.

0
4

[–] 21322748? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Complete misunderstanding of what happened. Fucking hell.

McConnell argument was in cases where the president is in his final year and his party doesn't control the senate, then no confirmations need happen.

Now, is that the case? No.

0
2

[–] 21323271? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

thank God at least someone is paying attention. ffs people

load more comments ▼ (34 remaining)