0
1

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They should go after the pharmaceuticals who prescribed all the shooters with drugs that caused violent tendacies. The guns didn't tell these people to kill.

0
0

[–] Foxygirl ago 

In WSJ. They won’t hear it!!

0
1

[–] hildberht 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Stop and think. If they hear it now with a conservative majority (Roberts obviously an issue) and rule against it then its over, precedent created, no liability. Better they hear it then a left wing controlled cess pool SC.

0
0

[–] blueblur ago 

So victim’s families could also sue Facebook and other social media for letting killers post shit online, right? Too bad those families are all fakes/scammers.

0
3

[–] Fateswebb 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Haha totally can backfire because now they have to prove there was an actual shooting that took place when all the actual evidence points to it being one big ass hoax..

0
1

[–] TheRealIndianaJoe 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Whole lot of evidence is missing from this happening.

0
0

[–] lsdflkoi ago 

No, next will be an attack on the manufacturers of ammunition...

They are already making it difficult to get where I live since Wally World was one of the few places you could still purchase ammo.

Just wait, you'll see...

0
1

[–] BirthTheGirth 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Need to push the antidepressant companies to be sued.

0
1

[–] nolocus2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

'a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15'

It's not just Remington folks. Either it gets thrown or leads to a ban. I want one now.

0
0

[–] Anon331717 ago 

Go buy 5

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)