1
2

[–] Anon331717 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is also commonly referred to as the "Gun Protection Act." The law dismissed all current claims against gun manufacturers in both federal and state courts and pre-empted future claims. The law could not be clearer in stating its purpose: "To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm caused solely by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended."

0
1

[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

They should go after the pharmaceuticals who prescribed all the shooters with drugs that caused violent tendacies. The guns didn't tell these people to kill.

0
1

[–] hildberht 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Stop and think. If they hear it now with a conservative majority (Roberts obviously an issue) and rule against it then its over, precedent created, no liability. Better they hear it then a left wing controlled cess pool SC.

0
1

[–] BirthTheGirth 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Need to push the antidepressant companies to be sued.

0
1

[–] nolocus2 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

'a weapon as dangerous as the Bushmaster AR-15'

It's not just Remington folks. Either it gets thrown or leads to a ban. I want one now.

0
0

[–] Anon331717 ago 

Go buy 5

0
0

[–] Foxygirl ago 

In WSJ. They won’t hear it!!

0
0

[–] blueblur ago 

So victim’s families could also sue Facebook and other social media for letting killers post shit online, right? Too bad those families are all fakes/scammers.

0
0

[–] lsdflkoi ago 

No, next will be an attack on the manufacturers of ammunition...

They are already making it difficult to get where I live since Wally World was one of the few places you could still purchase ammo.

Just wait, you'll see...

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)