0
0

[–] brettco12 ago 

Can fuckfacedad be prosecuted for laughing about his recently deaded kid?

0
3

[–] ALIENS2222 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How about the FED For destroying the world economy or the IRS for theft.

0
7

[–] 19810708321b 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

It will get thrown out. It would set multiple false precedents. Not to mention, Remington can use the opportunity to show it didn’t even happen. Now that would be an awakening for people.

0
1

[–] RampancyLambentRaven 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It will get thrown out based on this one line here based on the first amendment. "It also alleges Remington targeted younger, at-risk males in marketing and product placement in violent video games." Antonio Scalia a supreme court justice cast the deciding vote in 2010 that video games are protected speech under the first amendment. This whole ruling and lawsuit is unconstitutional from the start.

0
1

[–] blueblur 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Could we volunteer to help them?

0
2

[–] ReadPastHeadlines 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Not if every executive and lawyer on their side is found to have 2TB of child porn on their windows 95 computers.

0
5

[–] UpwardBound 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

This could actually be a good thing, if it creates an opportunity to examine more closely the events of Sandy Hook. There are a lot of very troubling issues with that whole event. Wolfgang Halbig tried to get answers to a great deal of common questions surrounding the cleanup and was threatened into backing off.

Questions like:

Why were no EMTs allowed into the building? Why were no medvac helicopters called in? Why is it that there were no wounded survivors that were taken to a hospital?

0
1

[–] KeepUrFork 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

And why no parents sued anyone when their children were not given the opportunity for any potential life-saving attention!

0
2

[–] Nosfewratsjews 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The SCOTUS is our legal system's form of controlled opposition. For evidence of this, you really need to look no further than the ratio of representation, and who controls everything about the SCOTUS.

To put it simply, Article 3 created the SCOTUS in 1783. Congress also gave itself the ability to create the "lesser courts". This was the beginning of the current system where Congress directly controls both the SCOTUS and the lesser courts, effectively putting Congress in charge of the entire legal system we have today.

It's just a numbers game, stupid. In 1783 we had 4 million Americans, so each SCOTUS Justice effectively represented approximately 800,000 Americans. Today there 340,000,000+ Citizens with who knows how many illegals, and only 9 Justices. That's 1 Justice to 38 million people. Impossible to get representation anymore without millions of dollars, in an increasingly corrupt system of Politics.

Icing on the cake, because Congress can effectively Govern the proles by passing any law they desire and creating any lesser court to handle those laws, they really have no incentive to expand the SCOTUS. Why would Congress critters jeopardize their primary objective for being in Politics in the first place, being generating their own fortunes and wealth, by giving the only check and balance to their corruption the ability to do it's job?

@WolfShepherd

0
2

[–] 0369Retired 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The SCOTUS is not supposed to represent citizens or, more importantly, political parties. It is supposed to preside over court cases referred from "lower" courts and apply the law to those cases as the highest judiciary body in the nation. In a nutshell, SCOTUS is supposed to impartially represent the law, not the people or political parties. As such, it has fallen well short of its intended purpose. As for this case, its a crap shoot as to what these 9 political hacks will do.

1
0

[–] Nosfewratsjews 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The SCOTUS is not supposed to represent citizens

Bullshit. It's quite literally the last appeal a Citizen can make in our legal framework. It represents the ability for a Citizen to challenge the lesser courts breach of the Constitution, which happens fucking hourly at this point but most people are not rich enough to go through the song and dance hoops to get to the SCOTUS.

1
2

[–] Anon331717 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is also commonly referred to as the "Gun Protection Act." The law dismissed all current claims against gun manufacturers in both federal and state courts and pre-empted future claims. The law could not be clearer in stating its purpose: "To prohibit causes of action against manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers of firearms or ammunition products, and their trade associations, for the harm caused solely by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended."

1
3

[–] PepeLovesPandas 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Pocket knives are next.

1
17

[–] 58wise 1 point 17 points (+18|-1) ago 

How do you insert evidence into public awareness? Enjoy the show. Newtown was a drill. All will be exposed.

0
0

[–] Headwest127 ago 

This. First they have to prove Adam Lanza did it, then they have to prove he did it with the particular weapon (Bushmaster).

0
0

[–] Karmy ago 

Recently I have been hearing the Sandy Hook Promise commercial on the radio and I find it really annoying. Don't try to brainwash me into thinking I can stop school shootings by voting for gun control.

0
2

[–] CMAnon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I really hope so. Enough oddities for a couple books. The one that gets me is that everyone in the area of Newtown had their mortgages paid off. https://archive.is/4zeKl

0
9

[–] ReadPastHeadlines 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

If it was a drill then why did they evacuate the same people over and over as they walked in circles back through the building?

If this wasn't a real shooting, then how do you explain every parent seen on TV having an acting background?

You filthy conspiracy theorist! I know a guy who lives near Maine and they have friends who are sad about the shooting happening. You have no heart repeating these hateful lies.

0
0

[–] ALIENS2222 ago 

I had that video and lost it. Do you have a copy or link?

load more comments ▼ (1 remaining)