[–] Scablifter 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
4th generation nuclear fusion my arse. Dr Judy Wood is the one to listen to, not this man.
[–] ZombiClown ago
I agree, the explanation by DR wood and this narrative are the same, although some of the this narrative is contradictory , I.E the damage that occurred blocks away. its contradicts the idea that somehow it was a reaction to something contained IN or close to the building.
[–] ACatIsFineToo ago
"The simplest explanation is usually the truth."
"Everything was simply destroyed by neutron bombardment from a fusion rector."
No, the simplest explanation is that Israel and their agents in the US government worked together to create a causus belli for war in the middle east.
[–] ACatIsFineToo ago (edited ago)
Because trying to divine how is, in my opinion, missing the forest for the trees. You wind up with everyone arguing about whether it was holograms or neutrons or thermite or missiles and the people who did it sit and laugh at you.
If you know someone committed murder, debating if it was done with a rifle or a pistol or a slingshot isn't really that material to the situation at hand.
Also, most of the claims made on that website you linked are complete misunderstandings of physics. An example, since so many claims are made that addressing them all would take hours: "q-switching" in lasers is done to create high intensity pulses, while lowering the average power dissipation. Power = energy * time. If time goes down more than power goes up, the energy transfer decreases. Pulsed lasers are used for a variety of applications that require precise amounts of energy delivered to small areas with high intensities. There are a host of physical issues that make scaling the technology to "building destruction" impossible regardless of your budget. The systems used in fusion research are the size of a football field.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Ignition_Facility The system in question fires a 500 terawatt pulse for "a few" picoseconds. (let's say 10.) 500TW10Ps = 500x10^12W10x10^-12s = 5000 joules of energy. That's around the muzzle energy of a 300 winchester magnum - not known for its building destroying capabilities.
Edit to add: For reference, the latent heat of melting of 1kg of iron is ~250 kj/kg. It would take 50 shots of the NIF to melt a kilogram of iron. A major success of the NIF facility was that it lowered the cooldown time for each shot to ~4 hours.
Or put memetically: Jet lasers can't melt steel beams.
[–] ThreeBladedKnife ago
How does this theory coalesce with Silverstein's "pulling" of Building 7?
The towers where likewise pulled. Building 7 didn't even have jet fuel. No building like that is going to free fall, unless you remove the support structure. It too, was deliberately destroyed and most likely the same weapon. So, after seeing 2 impossible towers free fall for no apparent reason, it wouldn't take much grey matter, that 7 was going to free fall also. He may also have known beforehand what had 2 be destroyed and why and who even?
[–] derram ago
https://archive.ph/2qw7b :
This has been an automated message.