Are you suggesting that a fusion bomb would not kill anyone or that nobody was killed? What happened on 911, was a fusion bomb that obliterated EVERYTHING, except porous material like paper. Bodies where disassembled, Steel, EVERYTHING blown apart at an atomic level via neutrons striking the protons and neutrons.
[–] ACatIsFineToo ago
Like I said, and maybe I'm not properly understanding how to read that website, I couldn't figure out what was actually being claimed. I certainly wasn't claiming no-one was killed, I was saying that if there was a massive release of neutrons at the site it would have killed anyone nearby.
What is actually being claimed here? I'm not trying to be a jerk, but I can't follow the website and still don't know.
If it's a miniature h-bomb? That's achievable, but doesn't seem like it would have much advantage over conventional explosives.
"Blowing apart everything on an atomic level" - wouldn't create visible dust and would create massive evidence in the form of isotopes of the breakdown products created. The entire site would have been dangerously radioactive for years later. And hydrogen bombs do most of their damage from release of conventional thermal energy, not from neutrons.
[–] justjakk [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
In Paul's research, he is claiming that it was a nuclear fusion reaction. That reaction result's in less than 10% (I think that was the number) of explosive energy. The result is a massive realease of neutron's. In that research, he explains and shows the actual test's conducted on blast radius. When the particles where released from the basement, they travelled up the elevator shaft and fanned out along any path they could. The entire structure was literally constructed for the sole purpose of testing this weapon on it. The reason it didn't kill anyone nearby is evident in the 2 video's shown. In them, the particle affects can be seen in the video feed to be disrupted with glitter(Paul also links to ACTUAL tests conducted which are IDENTICAL). After the glitter, the video sync goes out, then is completed disrupted. This weapon does NOT produce a huge BLAST or explosion. It's sole purpose is to release neutrons at a high rate of speed. An analogy is a billiards cue ball, striking a racked set of billiard balls. The cue ball blows the racked balls apart, and in turn, those balls bust up OTHER balls. This weapon was NOT an H-bomb, in the sense that most people think of it. It's a fusion reaction. Conventional explosives are chemical reactions that have no impact on material around them, other then than the explosion blowing the constructed objects to pieces. The objects are NOT converted to dust by conventional explosives. Watch the video's. There was nothing but dust and it was clearly visible. It was everywhere. and it WAS full of isotopes. That's why to this day, people are still getting cancer from 911. That's why ground zero has all that water circulation pools, covering up and filtering the radiation.
Plus, there are comparison photo's of hiroshima victims with radiation burns compared to some of those people working in that rubble. Any protection those people wore, was worthless. They ALL should have been wearing ground zero radiation suits, at the very least. Gee, I wonder why the site of 911 is named "ground zero". That's for nuclear impact sites. That's because this weapon IS NUCLEAR. Nuclear Fusion.