[–]justjakk[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
It was NEVER suggested in Paul's research that a Laser destroyed the buildings. OBVIOUSLY, you didn't read it. Lasers where used to produce the temperatures needed to harvest Neutron's.
It's a series of screencaptures from twitter, how do you suggest I read it in a coherent manner? Most of the things there are random snippets from fusion research for power plants.
Also, "harvesting" neutrons makes no sense outside of trying to create a nuclear chain reaction. Neutron embrittlement is a massive barrier to fusion power, but would be absurdly impractical to use as a weapon. Leaving aside that it would kill anyone present.
[–]justjakk[S]0 points
0 points
0 points
(+0|-0)
ago
Are you suggesting that a fusion bomb would not kill anyone or that nobody was killed? What happened on 911, was a fusion bomb that obliterated EVERYTHING, except porous material like paper. Bodies where disassembled, Steel, EVERYTHING blown apart at an atomic level via neutrons striking the protons and neutrons.
[–] ACatIsFineToo ago
It's a series of screencaptures from twitter, how do you suggest I read it in a coherent manner? Most of the things there are random snippets from fusion research for power plants.
Also, "harvesting" neutrons makes no sense outside of trying to create a nuclear chain reaction. Neutron embrittlement is a massive barrier to fusion power, but would be absurdly impractical to use as a weapon. Leaving aside that it would kill anyone present.
[–] justjakk [S] ago
Are you suggesting that a fusion bomb would not kill anyone or that nobody was killed? What happened on 911, was a fusion bomb that obliterated EVERYTHING, except porous material like paper. Bodies where disassembled, Steel, EVERYTHING blown apart at an atomic level via neutrons striking the protons and neutrons.