He's also big on antisemitism and anti israel. In the context of that, neocon-ism would actually be in our interest. The problem with neoconism is that we operate from an israel-first policy. Imagine if we took the oil of Iraq as the prize of victory, instead of leaving it to the shia hordes and the kurdish mongrels.
I can see why you'd draw that comparison, but neo-cons and Nick's paleo-inspired-conservatism operate by very different means--even if their outcome might be similar.
[–] 21208454? 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
That's the national socialist position. Neocon is zionist dressed up as conservativism. It's super stretchy to call him pro-war, he hasint really pushed for war to my knowledge.