0
0

[–] TalkingAnimal ago 

SHE didn't admonish him.

You either didn't read the article, or you lack basic reading comprehension. There's no point in trying to convince you, because you believe she was wrong on this issue because you don't trust her in general. It's entirely possible that this article is bullshit and the arguments against her on this issue are bogus while she's still a terrible untrustworthy person, but you're not open to that possibility, so why even bother talking to you?

Lord, I hope you're never on a jury.

0
0

[–] edistojim ago 

"untrustworthy person"?

Yeah, I sorta agree with that. At the very least she is head of the State Dept, and had not one clue about what was going on in the very same Dept she was supposed to be running? Its entirely possible that she is not lying , but not likely, she is a proven liar that has a track record to prove it.

My reading comprehension is fine, you may need to reread the article yourself.

I've sat on more than one jury including a Federal Jury, I'd like to think I'm fair and impartial but when the one thats being tried for murder is holding a smoking gun with their finger on the trigger and its not the first time they've been charged, I tend to be a little skeptical about their innocence. I'm human.