0
0

[–] 21059625? ago 

Wrong on all accounts. Just more presumptions without any actual research into the things mentioned.

Funny how quickly you dismiss the men and women involved in those careers know-nothings, too.

Typical Dunning Krueger Effect.

0
0

[–] 21059853? ago 

I'm not going to waste my time teaching you geotechnical engineering or Physics of flight or about material stress dynamics. Just stay on your flat earth and I will stick to my imaginary ball in space... building things you can't comprehend because they are beyond your horizon.

0
0

[–] 21059919? ago 

Good. I don't need it. I've built things you can't comprehend on my own and with large teams.

Do the math or the research or don't. But don't patronize me with emotional adhoc arguments predicated on suppositions and no formal understanding. The NAVY railgun does not account for it and neither does the software. Do you know how tracking/targeting works? Probably not. But I'll let you try to answer again.

Looking forward to your answer.

PS. Gyroscopes on Fighter Jets don't account for curvature either. Do the research or don't

0
0

[–] 21051474? ago 

The Danyang–Kunshan Grand Bridge in China is the longest bridge in the world (102.4 miles long). There nothing accounting for the non-existent curvature that only Never A Straight Answer (NASA) and it's counter-governmental agencies have ever seen.

NASA says the curvature can be seen at 33,000 ft. However, there are many photos and videos online (no I'm not going to do the research for you) that have been as high as 20 miles. Not only is there no curvature, the horizon always stays at eye level, something that would be impossible on a ball.

The only science you have is programming, indoctrination and big Mike!

0
0

[–] 21049521? ago 

and the bullet moves sideways