0
0

[–] sinclair ago 

Yah, I don't like that. I wanted to believe. But if that's real, that's not really okay.

0
0

[–] CAPT_ALOHA ago 

She's against most everything I'm for -- except for relaxing on the beach in the Islands while sipping on a Mai Tai.

Everything else?? Well, she's switched her position on so many political positions over the years when the trade winds blow that it's hard to keep up. She's a "creation" of something or someone and it's not conservative -- or even middle of the road, for that matter.

Heck, she probably doesn't even like Mai Tai's any more ...

0
0

[–] Deadbeat ago 

Once a Libtard always a libtard

0
2

[–] combatveteran 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Fun fact: the Kurds largely carried out the Armenian Genocide. They were promised the homes of the Armenians whom they ethnically cleansed.

0
3

[–] MeWalterKovacs 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

She is a proxy for Hillary Clinton and the CFR pawn. At least she learn to pivot like a pro from her master. She was put in place as the lesser of all evils for disillusioned Democrats and potentially some Republicans who are lost in the mainstream media shitstorm against Trump. the majority of Trumps base should be able to see her for what she is.

0
0

[–] sinclair ago  (edited ago)

They got some weird drama.

On one hand, you got these two guys from CAA, Darnell Strom and Michael Kives talking down to her, and addressing it to HRC and Podesta here. Dailly Caller coverage here

This was during 2016 election cause she resigned her DNC post to back Sanders, citing unfair DNC practices.

But she did get her start with Kirsten Gillibrand support (Aug 2012). So there's the whole sex cult connection; if you read the email, she sounds like she got heavily involved with that circle. Then she thanks Podesta for it.

She's Army.. is it possible she's a military infiltrator who's mission is to shit stir the DNC? Are her views her own, and she just says stuff for political expediency? Whom does she serve? If the public, exactly how?

It makes just as much sense to me that she's fighting to get the Democratic Party back; but it also makes sense a CFR asset trying to undermine America. I'm a bit torn what to think of all this. Preponderance of evidence is all circumstantial and guilt by association. What do you think? Her hands seem to be in a lot of pies. There's much more to that story, I just hit the tip.

0
0

[–] MeWalterKovacs ago 

I'm not saying this is the case, but it would have been an awesome strategic move to place a Trump-aligned Democrat in the running. Don't think that's Tulsi though. Thanks for the links I will read through them a.

0
0

[–] Jimmycog ago 

Flags change direction as the wind blows, DemonRats as usual.

0
0

[–] btrfly ago 

Which goes to show she is like all the rest of the Democrats and "listens to her leader" like the rest of the Dems... No one stands on their own...Ahhh good little dem...

0
0

[–] ArcAngel ago 

typical female.

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)