[–] johnjacobjingle 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
BS artist, move along and write her off as a looney-hypocrite.
The time stamps have these two statements being made on the same freaking day.
[–] combatveteran 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Fun fact: the Kurds largely carried out the Armenian Genocide. They were promised the homes of the Armenians whom they ethnically cleansed.
[–] MeWalterKovacs 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
She is a proxy for Hillary Clinton and the CFR pawn. At least she learn to pivot like a pro from her master. She was put in place as the lesser of all evils for disillusioned Democrats and potentially some Republicans who are lost in the mainstream media shitstorm against Trump. the majority of Trumps base should be able to see her for what she is.
They got some weird drama.
On one hand, you got these two guys from CAA, Darnell Strom and Michael Kives talking down to her, and addressing it to HRC and Podesta here. Dailly Caller coverage here
This was during 2016 election cause she resigned her DNC post to back Sanders, citing unfair DNC practices.
But she did get her start with Kirsten Gillibrand support (Aug 2012). So there's the whole sex cult connection; if you read the email, she sounds like she got heavily involved with that circle. Then she thanks Podesta for it.
She's Army.. is it possible she's a military infiltrator who's mission is to shit stir the DNC? Are her views her own, and she just says stuff for political expediency? Whom does she serve? If the public, exactly how?
It makes just as much sense to me that she's fighting to get the Democratic Party back; but it also makes sense a CFR asset trying to undermine America. I'm a bit torn what to think of all this. Preponderance of evidence is all circumstantial and guilt by association. What do you think? Her hands seem to be in a lot of pies. There's much more to that story, I just hit the tip.
[–] MeWalterKovacs ago
I'm not saying this is the case, but it would have been an awesome strategic move to place a Trump-aligned Democrat in the running. Don't think that's Tulsi though. Thanks for the links I will read through them a.
[–] Alderwolf ago (edited ago)
Yep, she does act flaky. I wonder if it's a act to attempt to remain "one of the group" in the demorat party or how she really thinks. Right now I'm leaning to give benefit of doubt and I wouldn't be surprised if she does turn out to be a nut job. Hard to tell in a world full of so many lies and disinformation.
[–] Specific_Fox ago
She's not a nut job. She knows exactly what she's doing. No doubt HRC has a paycheck waiting for this phony baloney