[–] CheeseboogerHimself 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
That is the face of an evil demon sent to Earth to try and destroy Gods white people.
[–] Acerphoon 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago (edited ago)
So the criticism is that the BJS sample size is too small.
Great, but it also seems to confirm other crime statistics, etc. So it seems to be true.
Also - At what point would the sample size become big enough? I fear this will be the same problem that we had with FST distance. where Lewontin or whatever his name was, found the FST distance between races to be at around 5-6% and said "it's too small to recognize subspecies".
When it was found that it was actually 12%, Lewontin obviously didn't change his stance. And frankly, no fst distance would ever be big enough to convince a race denier otherwise. So it's impossible.
And I think we have the same problem here. They will use the sample size as an argument, they will claim that it's too old, whatever. They will find any excuse they can, but at the end of the day, they won't change their stance anyway. I don't think any new, modern study with a big sample size would change their minds. It's really just an excuse.
[–] squishysquid ago
I remember back in the elections I tried to suggest to someone 50 people sounded like a small number to extrapolate how a state would vote. Apparently that was a major thought crime.
Also - At what point would the sample size become big enough?
there's this confidence variable you jam into the equation, most people who talk about statistics on the internet don't know this.
[–] Acerphoon 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
See, I get this. I get the point they're trying to make.
But I don't think it actually matters to them. They're just using it as a convenient excuse in my opinion. The new BJS statistic doesn't even show race and ethnicity. - And I think that's for a good reason.
[–] jewsbadnews 1 point 4 points 5 points (+5|-1) ago
Why are Jews all like this?
[–] lord_nougat 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
They're required to be, by deeply held tenets from their Rules of Acquisition.
[–] VicariousJambi 0 points 19 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago
Oh hey I just posted about this
[–] shifty_pete [S] 1 point 21 points 22 points (+22|-1) ago
Not only that, but no other races raped blacks either. Yikes. That's a problem, sweatie.
[–] xenoPsychologist 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
blacks are unrapeable. thats really all there is to say on the matter.
[–] TwoNiggersandaHonky 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
It's debatable they're datable, let alone rapeable.
[–] samwisekoi 0 points 12 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago
Everybody deserves their own opinion. No one deserves their own facts.
Now at https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus08.pdf page 55 of the pdf. (This is for 2008.)
Criminal Victimization in the United States, 2008 - Statistical Tables
* United States Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
* March, 2010
.
Table 42. Personal crimes of violence, 2008:
Percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, by type of crime, race of victim, and perceived race of offender
Rape/sexual assault (Includes verbal threats of rape and threats of sexual assault.)
* Victim was White, perceived race of offender was Black: 19,292.96 (117,640 x 16.4%)
* Victim was Black, perceived race of offender was White: 0*
*Estimate is based on 10 or fewer sample cases.
[–] recon_johnny 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
What the fuck sample size?
And sure as shit, Blacks raping White women wouldn't have decreased by 1/2 (35% in 2005).....
[–] Damnpasswords ago
The sample size of white on black rapes was too small, get it? They didn't ask ten random black female rape victims if their rapists were white, they simply couldn't find enough victims of white on black rape
[–] Troothseeker 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Lies, damned lies, and jews!