Weak article, tbh. Yeah, they use the same advisers for the campaign, but in the end, it's just PR bullshit, it doesn't talk about the source of the influence other than implying that both parties enable shady business. Wouldn't it be better to highlight the globalist takeover of canadian politics that ended up destroying the sovereignty of the state during the daddy trudeau era? But of course, it's not good PR for any parties since it implies that all parties are part of the same game: the conservative didn't revert any damage the liberals did. A party won't be able to have any media attention if it doesn't toe the globalist line. It's not a good meme to polarize the voters, so yeah, libralz ebil.
[–] scandalous-goat ago
Weak article, tbh. Yeah, they use the same advisers for the campaign, but in the end, it's just PR bullshit, it doesn't talk about the source of the influence other than implying that both parties enable shady business. Wouldn't it be better to highlight the globalist takeover of canadian politics that ended up destroying the sovereignty of the state during the daddy trudeau era? But of course, it's not good PR for any parties since it implies that all parties are part of the same game: the conservative didn't revert any damage the liberals did. A party won't be able to have any media attention if it doesn't toe the globalist line. It's not a good meme to polarize the voters, so yeah, libralz ebil.