[–] [deleted] 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
2

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

In order to willingly give up universal human rights...

...there must be an (((emergency!)))

1
5

[–] pby [S] 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

One: “The world has warmed at less than half the originally predicted rate, and at less than half the rate to be expected on the basis of net anthropogenic forcing and radiative imbalance. It tells us that we are far from understanding climate change.”

Two: “Climate models have many shortcomings and are not remotely plausible as policy tools. Moreover, they most likely exaggerate the effect of greenhouse gases such as CO2. In addition, they ignore the fact that enriching the atmosphere with CO2 is beneficial.”

Three: “There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm. We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050. If better approaches emerge, we will have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world.”

0
1

[–] Horrux 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

And before the climate emergency, there was the "fat is killing us all" emergency. And the "let's give money creation to outside forces" emergency. And so on, and so forth. There are dozens of such "emergencies" and "crises" that are completely made up in order to bullshit the populations into guilt, taxes, and of course, control.

0
0

[–] chirogonemd ago 

0
6

[–] DestroyerOfSaturn 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

No one will believe them like engineers and architects over 9/11

0
0

[–] Purged ago 

meh. What do they know about buildings that a DC commision doesn't?

0
2

[–] Fuckle_Chucks 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Well, that commission was filled with scientifically-trained people. The last thing they wanted were political hacks like engineers and architects....

0
3

[–] blackguard19 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Anyone who says “the science is settled” is not talking about science. By definition science is tentative and repeatable and fears no testing. Science is never settled, only dogma.

0
1

[–] Fuckle_Chucks 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Anyone who says “the science is settled” is not talking about science.

These people have absolutely no idea what science is....

0
1

[–] TheAntiZealot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The dogma is settled, indeed.

0
2

[–] Fuckle_Chucks 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Scientists Call For Reasoned Debate

Reasoned debate? If the JWO wanted "reasoned debate" they wouldn't have brought a 16-year-old retard all the way from sweden to emot at the (((UN))).

0
2

[–] fluhthreeex 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There Is A Pollution Emergency

0
3

[–] Fuckle_Chucks 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

There's Is A jewish Emergency.

0
0

[–] fluhthreeex ago 

Can we solve two birds in one stoning?

0
0

[–] Horrux ago 

JFK in the 1960s: "Soon we will fully control the weather"

I wonder what happened? ;-)

0
0

[–] Blood-is-Nature ago 

Dear scientists,

"jewish criminal behavior"...debate that.

Sincerely, humanity.

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)