0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

This is INCORRECT

China is a very REAL threat to the US as is Russia

Together they are formidable, if not unbeatable

China has virtually all US tech thanks to Obama and a process that began w/Clinton if not before

China/Russia/NK/Iran will nuke the US eventually followed by ground invasion

POTUS is America's greatest President but he was only a temporary reprieve against the NWO

The Book of Revelations must be fulfilled

Watch in coming years for 1-2 US aircraft carriers in Strait of Hormuz to be sunk

WWIII

The US will fall and global tyranny ensue

0
0

[–] TSE [S] ago 

China is no threat to the USA. China has 300-400 warheads, the united states has 8000+. Do you know how Chine would look like 30 minutes after a first strike scenario? Have you seen the movie The Terminator where the ground is covered with skulls? They are all Chinese skulls.

0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

  1. I am a Patriot, let me be very clear of that AND a supporter of POTUS as the greatest President in US history
  2. Your analysis fails for the following reason: consider a man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet. He goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead. Your logic would imply otherwise. Furthermore, China + Russia + Iran + NK have enough firepower to successfully achieve the CABAL's objective: laying siege to the only nation currently preventing a global NWO headed by a single man of evil origin. Nukes + ground invasion. China and Russia's nuclear subs combined are a potent force. It only takes a few nukes to destroy most of the US population centers.
  3. I fully agree with your assessment re. a first strike scenario, and heartily recommend that strategy. It is the only one that could plausibly deter the scenario I lay out above. However, POTUS is unlikely to employ it. He has his hands full and likely believes he can achieve his objectives through economic means. The West has lost sight of the true Marxist mentality, one that is very much at the heart of not only China but also Russia. They want to rule. They will for a brief time. So yes, first strike on China--carried out right away on the entire country--is required, but will never be carried out.
    This is not an outcome I seek, but rather one I see unavoidable. POTUS has control of the US, not of our adversaries who already possess US tech. Russia, for instance, has ALL of our secrets, including the location of our nukes, a secret known only by a small number of people.

0
1

[–] moderator99 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Little fucks never got past chopsticks! You expect they know what they're doing? Or is the danger in that they don't?

0
1

[–] DanijelStark 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

I think that China stole much of the tech ... but what is in black projects in US domain is even far more versatile and powerful . So , this would be obsolete .

But the real war isnt waged by weapons - but by trade numbers which will ultimately create the biggest gap that CPC ( Cabal installed ) wont be able to pass over ...

0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

Unfortunately, no

Chinese and Russian subs patrolling the US coasts can launch nukes to hit US cities within minutes. Tech may be able to stop a few but certainly not all if not most

More relevantly, the enemy has ALL our secrets, including location of our weaponry

They will take out those targets first

Why did Congresswoman Swallwell threaten that our "allies" won't come to our defense?

Because they won't when we are destroyed first w/nukes then w/ground troops

The Plan's greatest weakness was the failure to take our Obama & Co. LITERALLY soon after the inauguration. Obama should be 6 feet under. Instead, he will one day return to the White House as a communisty tyrant persecuting Christians.

0
0

[–] DanijelStark ago 

You forget one important thing .

China launches nukes - there is something called Mutually Assured Destruction ( MAD ) that goes from Cold War ... it would be an end for China , too .

And even if China attacks the US anywhere ... the China heavily relies on US outsourcing and exports to USA . Do you think there would be even a minimum of that in case of hot open war ?

The China loses WHATEVER they do ... and thats why Trump can play any card he wants and knows China wont be foolish enough to do anything more than barking ...

Also , militarily , China has no means to project the invasion force ... how many carrier task forces do they have ? How many carrier task forces do USA have ? Is China capable even to invade the Taiwan ?

Everything that needs to be shown is already shown in example of Hong Kong ... China is very very careful what they do ( and even in that case , theyre typically reckless communists ) not to piss off EU , too ... because when that occurs , its game over .

China knows their monopoly and even the survival is at stake ... they will try to do everything they can , but theyre not so idiotic to blast their head off clean ...

0
0

[–] zxcvbnasdf ago 

You mean the SAPs that Clinton sold the Chinese?

0
0

[–] DanijelStark ago 

To one extent , yes ... but we know there are USAPs which are level above SAPs .

And this is not something China has ... I dont think there will ever be an open "hot" war against China - because they will implode from within because of their economy not capable to leech off the others anymore ...

0
1

[–] 20787097? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Is that propaganda, or were they not able to steal the most critical elements of the tech? The people that sold us out so that China could become a huge military power are traitors who deserve punishment appropriate to the long term effects of their crimes.

0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

You don't understand that China was being artificially propped up to take out a significant chunk of the world's ("excess") population. They have virtually everything and have ZERO interest in peace or financial stability. They want POWER = WAR. That is their only purpose. They will have to attack within coming years as they are hemorrhaging economically and can no longer afford to maintain their global leading arsenal

USE IT OR LOSE IT

They will use it

0
0

[–] Odius1 ago 

Oh you mean Ol' Slick Willie.