0
0

[–] Runspotrun ago 

I believe that your analysis is shared in Washington and thus ensures that my concerns will be ignored, though I fear that will spell ruin for our nation.

1. I am a Patriot, let me be very clear of that AND a supporter of POTUS as the greatest President in US history

2. Your analysis fails for the following reason: consider a man who owns one .22 revolver and exactly 1 bullet. He goes to his next door neighbors house--who happens to own a franchise of gun stores--and blows his head off at point blank range. The neighbor is dead. Your logic would imply otherwise. Furthermore, China + Russia + Iran + NK have enough firepower to successfully achieve the CABAL's objective: laying siege to the only nation currently preventing a global NWO headed by a single man of evil origin. Nukes + ground invasion. China and Russia's nuclear subs combined are a potent force. It only takes a few nukes to destroy most of the US population centers.

3. I fully agree with your assessment re. a first strike scenario, and heartily recommend that strategy. It is the only one that could plausibly deter the scenario I lay out above. However, POTUS is unlikely to employ it. He has his hands full and likely believes he can achieve his objectives through economic means. The West has lost sight of the true Marxist mentality, one that is very much at the heart of not only China but also Russia. They want to rule. They will for a brief time. So yes, first strike on China--carried out right away on the entire country--is required, but will never be carried out.

This is not an outcome I seek, but rather one I see unavoidable. POTUS has control of the US, not of our adversaries who already possess US tech. Russia, for instance, has ALL of our secrets, including the location of our nukes, a secret known only by a small number of people.