0
1

[–] 20725353? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Seeing increased chatter about that demonic witch, sure she's feeling the pressure.

0
3

[–] 20725371? 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

I hope you are right. I am getting worried

0
3

[–] 20725389? [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] 20728702? ago 

kek! That's (Andrew Zebrun III) the guy on Dissenter who always copy/pastes the article's URL that he is discussing. This is ridiculously stupid behavior which I have called him out on, and he continues!

Stupid why? Because: the article being discussed is part of the comment, so doesn't need another link to it. And, if it was preservation purposes, the article's site owners can make changes and then the link may not show what it did when Andrew made the comment he made along with the article link (and, furthermore he almost never makes an actual comment -- generally, it's the URL to the article, and a quote from the article, which generally doesn't have quotes around it!).

To properly preserve the article, copy the URL, go to archive.is, paste it in, and then copy the archive.is link, and paste THAT into his comment.

Called him out on it several times, in fact, with no response. Perhaps he's a bot?

0
0

[–] 20729340? ago 

Interesting speculation. Archived. https://archive.fo/zAHYr

0
41

[–] 20725557? 0 points 41 points (+41|-0) ago 

How do you get the criminal news outlets to cover their own demise? Tell them it's an Impeachment hearing! Trump & his lawyers can subpoena ANYONE and ask them ANYTHING! Think Comey, Clapper, Brennan, Hitlary all throwing each other under the bus. Then come the indictments and the gitmo trials. The fucking plan is genus and I am sorry I ever doubted it, we are in the opening credits of this movie so sit back and enjoy the shitshow!

0
22

[–] 20726596? 0 points 22 points (+22|-0) ago 

The past 2-3 years of theories and hypothesis are about to be tested soon. It will be interesting to see which ones were accurate and which ones weren’t.

0
7

[–] 20727139? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

^^ this

0
0

[–] 20727218? ago 

Who cares if the news outlets carry anything, at first? No need to have an impeachment hearing. Have the trials, subpoena those needed, get convictions and as these traitors are hauled off to GITMO, it's going to be impossible for the news media to avoid the reality.

5
-4

0
1

[–] 20725900? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The Dems are so eager to take potshots at Trump they'll believe anything. Not that they ever had any sense about it, but they're getting more and more gullible as their desperation ramps up. I'll be glad when the guillotine finally drops and we put them out of their misery. Watching them is getting painful - even though they're losing.

0
6

[–] 20726045? 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Woke up this morning smiling not knowing why, must've been good dreams. In October 2016 just as wikileaks stories were breaking, I woke up with the song ding dong the wh itch is dead causing me to feel very happy, I turned on the news and comey is hem hawing over reopening the Hillary emails on huma's husbands laptop labeled insurance. Same feeling this morning, watching the schiff and pelosi struggle with cloudstrike. Red October is on. Ready aim fire. Smile

0
7

[–] 20726623? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Crowdstrike

Cloudflare

gotta keep em separated

0
1

[–] 20727387? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

CloudCrowd

0
2

[–] 20728767? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I saw Cloudflare in a Slashdot article earlier today, interesting! https://news.slashdot.org/story/19/09/26/1710239/cloudflare-google-chrome-and-firefox-add-http3-support

0
0

[–] 20732034? ago 

Go offspring yourself somewhere else

0
7

[–] 20726080? 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

Seth Rich

0
4

[–] 20726148? 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

It could be a white hat operation, but you should not use the verb “is” without providing any evidence.

0
5

[–] 20726471? [S] 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Sound like Bill Clinton is on the board here.

0
8

[–] 20726641? 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Well that depends on what the definition of is is.

0
0

[–] 20729362? ago 

It could be a white hat operation, but you should not use the verb “is” without providing any evidence.

I agree. OP is contributing interesting & valuable allegation & speculation. But allegations & speculations are not to confuse with facts & evidences.

Speculations?

For those not familiar with SPECULATIONS, it means the guessing information WITHOUT proof. In other words, the activity of guessing possible answers to a question without having enough information to be certain. Think of speculation as a RUMOUR without proof. Read more at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumor

Archived at https://archive.fo/7sSa2

Allegations?

For those not familiar with ALLEGATIONS, it means the claim of a fact, WITHOUT proof. Read more at

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allegation

Archived at https://archive.fo/rAasz

load more comments ▼ (18 remaining)