0
3

[–] yuzernaym [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I didn't watch all of it, but there was plenty to alarm honest law-abiding citizens:

  • Nobody was able to define what an "assault rifle" is. (surprise!)

  • There were lots of "think of the children" statements, some fake crying, and plenty of pulling on emotional heart-strings.

  • Someone said only a shotgun should be allowed for personal defense (and only at home). Pistols and rifles should only be accessible for hunting or sport shooting at a range.

  • Someone said not only should they ban future production and sales of "assault rifles", but they need to buy-back confiscate the existing ones.

They really do intend on taking your "assault fully semi-automatic bolt-action rifles." And according to their vague testimony, even more guns should be looked at and banned.

Here is one of the gun-grabbers, never heard of this guy before:

Jamie "Brillo-Pad" Raskin https://files.catbox.moe/fcknkb.jpg

0
3

[–] Nosferatjew 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How many lamp shades do you think we could get out of that guy?

0
1

[–] BearDolphin1488 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It really is jews, isnt it.

0
1

[–] derram 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

0
0

[–] LiamOdinThomas ago  (edited ago)

Uuuhhhhhhh............WHAT ASSAULT WEAPONS?!!!!

SO I GUESS A PISTOL IS NOW AN ASSAULT WEAPON?!

0
0

[–] nosejobsforequality ago 

you can't ban something that doesn't exist... there's no such thing as an "assault weapon"

and another reminder... if they want the guns, they'll get all the bullets first.

0
0

[–] BitChuteArchive ago