you can't ban something that doesn't exist... there's no such thing as an "assault weapon"
and another reminder... if they want the guns, they'll get all the bullets first.
[–] LiamOdinThomas ago (edited ago)
Uuuhhhhhhh............WHAT ASSAULT WEAPONS?!!!!
SO I GUESS A PISTOL IS NOW AN ASSAULT WEAPON?!
[–] yuzernaym [S] 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago (edited ago)
I didn't watch all of it, but there was plenty to alarm honest law-abiding citizens:
Nobody was able to define what an "assault rifle" is. (surprise!)
There were lots of "think of the children" statements, some fake crying, and plenty of pulling on emotional heart-strings.
Someone said only a shotgun should be allowed for personal defense (and only at home). Pistols and rifles should only be accessible for hunting or sport shooting at a range.
Someone said not only should they ban future production and sales of "assault rifles", but they need to buy-back confiscate the existing ones.
They really do intend on taking your "assault fully semi-automatic bolt-action rifles." And according to their vague testimony, even more guns should be looked at and banned.
Here is one of the gun-grabbers, never heard of this guy before:
Jamie "Brillo-Pad" Raskin https://files.catbox.moe/fcknkb.jpg
[–] Nosferatjew 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
How many lamp shades do you think we could get out of that guy?
[–] BitChuteArchive ago
https://www.bitchute.com/video/UdB2FxXnlznc