0
16

[–] 20713954? 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Everyone should read the whole transcript. POTUS doing a great job with foreign leaders!

0
9

[–] 20714609? 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago 

That was a very good interaction between two foreign leaders. It is how conversations between allies should go.

0
1

[–] 20713947? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Wait? This convo is from late July, 2019? I assumed the whistleblower convo was like a few days ago, a few days before the whistleblower came forward? So the whistleblower had knowledge of a convo and decides to go public 2 months after this convo?

1
4

[–] 20714006? 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Bolton (deep state) OUT => P.A.N.I.C. (no more inside intel) => Ramp up peach mint talks (a few days after Bolton out)

0
2

[–] 20713940? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

The lunatics have taken over the DemoncRAT Party. Bye, Bye, Ms. Pan-American Lies...

0
1

[–] 20713917? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Now that was just an earth shattering impeachable convo..LOL....NOT

[–] [deleted] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] 20717791? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Maybe. But I don't think so. Not a nada this time because a simple nada would mean that the Dems have nothing, and it ends. But THIS TIME the Dems did get something in addition to the egg on their faces. They got Crowdstrike brought back to the front page. They even got Hunter Biden, the boy of privilege who had never served a day in the military in his life getting an OFFICER spot in the Navy Reserves, only to blow it in the next round of drug tests (+ for cocaine while on duty); but who needs a fake job for looks & prestige when he can pull in 50K per month doing next-to-nothing as a board member? This time it wasn't nada; it was What's that?

0
1

[–] 20713851? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

They don't care. They will march forward with impeachment of the POTUS.

1
-1

[–] 20715716? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

You keep pushing this on multiple threads. Please answer this question:

So what if (((the house))) impeaches Trump? Even if it passes it FAILS! Why? Because normies THINK impeachment is being removed from office. They literally do not understand the process and role of the Senate. So to the normies it would be a FAILURE (Trump still in office). How would that be perceived by the normies? Especially given the fact of the transcript being a nothing burger.

P.S. The normies may not know how the process works, but the Dems do. They will NEVER get the votes on this attempt because it a lose-lose-loser for them. They may try anyway but for what purpose except to deflect from Bidens crimes.

P.S.S. Don't forget, this is just UKRAINE (3 mill or so to hunter). Next is CHINA where we're talking the BIG BUCKS (1.5 B)

Response?

0
1

[–] 20720105? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

The House will not Impeach now. Nancy Pelosi understands how much the Dems have to lose, and until two days ago she had consistently resisted. Then with the Whistle Blower getting so much media coverage, she holds a press conference to announce that she is asking the House committees to "explore" impeachment.

I believe Pelosi thought that she had the perfect compromise! Deep down her political instincts tell her impeachment is a loser without stronger evidence. But she could spin "exploring" as even-handed to the public while tossing a "maybe bone" to Nadler, Waters, and all the other TDS sufferers who've been screeching or pounding for impeachment. The only thing that she calculated properly was that Trump would never in a million years turn over that transcript to a House committee; and he did not. He gave it to the public though! Hallelujah! As soon as Pelosi wavered just the slightest on her 'no impeachment' stance, the public got truth-bombed. Patriots are grinning ear to ear.

0
0

[–] 20715783? ago 

?

0
1

[–] 20714118? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Let them try? It's theatrics and nothing more.