0
0

[–] 20725576? ago 

Again you have assumed I am some sort of shill, Again you have made an ass out of yourself. I am not inclined to answer any of your questions. You have no authority over me. By your reply it is obvious that you are just another pompous self seeking self loving covetous proud unholy individual.

I am quite well aware of the impeachment process. You think that the Senate will save the POTUS. Don't count your chickens until the eggs are hatched. It takes 2/3rds of the Senate to vote on a trial. There are 5 RINO's in the Senate that could flip the vote to hold trials.

See ya don't wanna be ya.

0
0

[–] 20726210? ago 

This is an open forum, and for those who may read down this far they will see you exposing yourself. My assumption that you are a shill is evident from your nonsensical responses, and continued push on a false narrative. For a "person" of high "wits" your pretty fucking stupid.

Here, let me help you understand reality: 2/3 of the Senate = 67 votes. There are currently 45/D, 53R, 2/I. (Since Is vote D there are essentially = 47D votes).

To reach 67 - 20 R's would have to vote with D's. You yourself said there are 5 RINOs - so to humor you we'll say 47 + 5 = 52.

Now for the slow ones in class (that's you) an additional 15 Republican Senators would have to cross the isle and vote with D's. Question: Who's counting chickens? (that would be you, not me - another shill tactic - projection)

Summary:

a) There are current NOT enough votes in the House to Impeach (Accuse / Indict). Granted this could change, but it's unlikely (see c below)

b) If by some miracle the House DID impeach, 20 Republican Senators (or 15 non-RINOs) would need to vote for conviction in the Senate.

c) Underlying ALL of this LOGIC is of course something you are not acknowledging: Trump didn't do a fucking thing illegal, so the "charges" would be non-existent as defined by the Constitution (High Crimes and Misdemeanors). Given this fact, it is highly unlikely that Purple district Dems in the House would vote to start the process.

In conclusion, for a self-proclaimed person of high mental "wits", I recommend you reevaluate your self worth and take appropriate action (please stay away from dangerous weapons, they can be deadly in the hands of the ignorant, untrained, children.)

0
0

[–] 20729791? ago  (edited ago)

When one has no factual evidence that the Senate and members of the Senate will not vote against the President proves what I said about you. You're basing your outcome on hyperbole (ASSUMPTIONS).

Naturally when challenged those who have a below zero IQ lash out with expletives.