0
1

[–] blackguard19 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So Voyager 1, which is said to be 13 billion miles from earth, can’t show stars or nebulae, or videos of its supposed flybys of planets, because the “sun is out?” How exactly is the sun “out” when you’re not even orbiting the sun? And why don’t they just adjust exposure settings to show these celestial bodies when the sun is not “out?”

Way to waste your time formatting a typical shill quote-mining response in a dead thread. Im only responding so the stray latecomer will see how retarded the shills are. Pointing out the typical wall of text quote-mined response, the “let me answer your question with a question” replies, and the way you still dodge the question about the fake-ass Apollo moon landings. Saying that a 90 degree turn of a camera is comparable to rotating the camera freely in every direction..... you’re really dumb kid. You need to ask for help with your script.

You just said “all the ones we do have,” meaning that there are videos of stars, planets, and nebulae, when there is literally not a single one. You think people are dumb enough to just swallow low-effort lies like that, I guess.

You won’t debate me in a public thread because you’re an inept embarrassment. Just keep wasting your effort in a dead thread that no one will see.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

Voyager 1

Sure, here's a picture from Voyager showing some of the planets.

And why don’t they just adjust exposure settings to show these celestial bodies when the sun is not “out?”

Because it would let in so much light bouncing off the earth it'd be pure white.

0
0

[–] blackguard19 [S] ago 

So now a picture is a video? Also LMAO at anyone who buys that that smudge is a real photo. What does light bouncing off the earth have to do with something 13 billion miles away? Please keep following me around, between the two of us we’ll easily expose all of NASA’s fake garbage.