0
0

[–] blackguard19 [S] ago  (edited ago)

First of all it’s a fixed camera that does not rotate in all directions. I’m talking about an astronaut on a space walk or even a “deep space probe” that has a camera which can actually look in every direction. Space is supposed to be infinite, and supposed to have shit in it. Yet we never see anyone just take a camera and say ok here you can see a bunch of stars, and if I turn it to the left you can see a galaxy, and if I turn it to the right you can see the sun, and if I turn it beneath me we can see a nebula, and if I look straight up we can see another galaxy, and if I look behind me you can see this planet, etc. All we see is a plain black background every single time. Super easy to fake. Nothing that couldn’t be easily and cheaply faked. No breathtaking starscape, no parallax, just easily faked blackness.

The bullshit about camera exposure settings is what people (shills) say about the moon landings not having any stars. Ok great, even though that’s a retarded and weak pseudo-justification, it’s been 50 years and we still don’t have any video of any planets, stars, nebulae, etc. that actually are in space? Total garbage. Just green screen and swimming pool bullshit that only a moron could accept as genuine.

And also you obviously didn’t answer the question about whether you say the moon landings are real, could you be any more obvious of a shill? Way to totally dodge that simple yes or no question. Kind of like how you’re playing ignorant about what “outer space” means..... you showed me a video that is supposed to take place in low earth orbit with a CGI earth taking up 80% of the field of view at all times and then ask me how “low earth orbit” isn’t “outer space.”

I have spent enough time on Reddit to spot the pattern of the same users showing up whenever space fakery is mentioned to defend the government agency called NASA; at least on Voat you can call shills shills with no consequence.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

First of all it’s a fixed camera that does not rotate in all directions. I’m talking about an astronaut on a space walk or even a “deep space probe” that has a camera which can actually look in every direction.

It had a panoramic sweep over 90 degrees. As for helmet cams, all spacewalks have those now.

Yet we never see anyone just take a camera and say ok here you can see a bunch of stars, and if I turn it to the left you can see a galaxy, and if I turn it to the right you can see the sun, and if I turn it beneath me we can see a nebula, and if I look straight up we can see another galaxy, and if I look behind me you can see this planet

Stars and nebulas are too weak to see when the sun is out. I showed you video of the sun and a planet at the same time, but you didn't like it.

it’s been 50 years and we still don’t have any video of any planets, stars, nebulae, etc

You mean aside from all the ones we do have, that you dislike?

CGI earth

What're you basing that on?

0
1

[–] blackguard19 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

So Voyager 1, which is said to be 13 billion miles from earth, can’t show stars or nebulae, or videos of its supposed flybys of planets, because the “sun is out?” How exactly is the sun “out” when you’re not even orbiting the sun? And why don’t they just adjust exposure settings to show these celestial bodies when the sun is not “out?”

Way to waste your time formatting a typical shill quote-mining response in a dead thread. Im only responding so the stray latecomer will see how retarded the shills are. Pointing out the typical wall of text quote-mined response, the “let me answer your question with a question” replies, and the way you still dodge the question about the fake-ass Apollo moon landings. Saying that a 90 degree turn of a camera is comparable to rotating the camera freely in every direction..... you’re really dumb kid. You need to ask for help with your script.

You just said “all the ones we do have,” meaning that there are videos of stars, planets, and nebulae, when there is literally not a single one. You think people are dumb enough to just swallow low-effort lies like that, I guess.

You won’t debate me in a public thread because you’re an inept embarrassment. Just keep wasting your effort in a dead thread that no one will see.