0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

I clearly said outer space and you showed a pathetically fake video that is the opposite of that.

What makes you say that?

0
0

[–] blackguard19 [S] ago  (edited ago)

First of all it’s a fixed camera that does not rotate in all directions. I’m talking about an astronaut on a space walk or even a “deep space probe” that has a camera which can actually look in every direction. Space is supposed to be infinite, and supposed to have shit in it. Yet we never see anyone just take a camera and say ok here you can see a bunch of stars, and if I turn it to the left you can see a galaxy, and if I turn it to the right you can see the sun, and if I turn it beneath me we can see a nebula, and if I look straight up we can see another galaxy, and if I look behind me you can see this planet, etc. All we see is a plain black background every single time. Super easy to fake. Nothing that couldn’t be easily and cheaply faked. No breathtaking starscape, no parallax, just easily faked blackness.

The bullshit about camera exposure settings is what people (shills) say about the moon landings not having any stars. Ok great, even though that’s a retarded and weak pseudo-justification, it’s been 50 years and we still don’t have any video of any planets, stars, nebulae, etc. that actually are in space? Total garbage. Just green screen and swimming pool bullshit that only a moron could accept as genuine.

And also you obviously didn’t answer the question about whether you say the moon landings are real, could you be any more obvious of a shill? Way to totally dodge that simple yes or no question. Kind of like how you’re playing ignorant about what “outer space” means..... you showed me a video that is supposed to take place in low earth orbit with a CGI earth taking up 80% of the field of view at all times and then ask me how “low earth orbit” isn’t “outer space.”

I have spent enough time on Reddit to spot the pattern of the same users showing up whenever space fakery is mentioned to defend the government agency called NASA; at least on Voat you can call shills shills with no consequence.

0
0

[–] clamhurt_legbeard ago 

First of all it’s a fixed camera that does not rotate in all directions. I’m talking about an astronaut on a space walk or even a “deep space probe” that has a camera which can actually look in every direction.

It had a panoramic sweep over 90 degrees. As for helmet cams, all spacewalks have those now.

Yet we never see anyone just take a camera and say ok here you can see a bunch of stars, and if I turn it to the left you can see a galaxy, and if I turn it to the right you can see the sun, and if I turn it beneath me we can see a nebula, and if I look straight up we can see another galaxy, and if I look behind me you can see this planet

Stars and nebulas are too weak to see when the sun is out. I showed you video of the sun and a planet at the same time, but you didn't like it.

it’s been 50 years and we still don’t have any video of any planets, stars, nebulae, etc

You mean aside from all the ones we do have, that you dislike?

CGI earth

What're you basing that on?

1
0

[–] MrPaul 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The fakest, shoddiest, and goofiest thing I perceive is your expletive-laden grasp at scholarship.

0
1

[–] blackguard19 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Do you know what scholarship means? Because I never claimed it. Your last post was 1.6 years ago, literally your sole contribution to this website, and now you randomly show up to shill for NASA space fantasies? You really seem like a shill. You’re saying the moon landings were real then?

0
1

[–] MrPaul 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

No, I'm saying you're a limp noodle and if I met you in real life I would dislike you more than I do now.