1
12

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 12 points (+13|-1) ago 

The TROLLS HERE ARE QUICK. The very second I post something there is ALREADY A DOWN VOTE.

0
2

[–] ticketyboo 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Their mantra: Must Destroy

1
4

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago  (edited ago)

So demonic. Pure Evil like Q says.

"These people are sick & evil.

It is not a coincidence.

It never is.

Q"

1
6

[–] littlestown 1 point 6 points (+7|-1) ago 

It means the AI has identified it as useful and informative.

0
3

[–] bopper 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3334087

He recently told a researcher he would release the rest, we'll see what happens.

1
1

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Hope so.

I have a question. I'm about 2/3 done with the book. Isn't Christoper Fulton AFRAID of the Deep State by coming out with his book? Pretty damning stuff in there for them. They are very sick and evil people.

0
2

[–] bopper 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yes, he's nervous. His dad has been hassled as well. They are still trying to get the audio tapes that he has. There's one or two interviews on youtube of him.

0
2

[–] Ramp7 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's a great book. Worth reading. My Wife read it and now a friend has it. Couldn't put it down once started.

0
5

[–] Shiftworker1976 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Thanks for this input didn't realize Trump was holding back the findings due to national security. 3 years is along time. Trump is has been in office for almost 3 years. Plan trustees I thought said 3 year plan. I'm patient.

1
0

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

You're welcome. Trump said that in April 2018 so 3 years would be 2021.

0
4

[–] ghost_of_aswartz 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Unless he loses in 2020, in which case the release date will be infinity

Therefore: VOTE

0
2

[–] Jfunction 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

There are cases in which patience is just acquiescence. This is one such case.

0
0

[–] Shiftworker1976 ago 

55 will have the last say about the release.

3
-2

[–] DickTick 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

What are you even talking about? This shit has been tried and denied many times. It just so happens Q popped up after that particular request denial... This would only be worth a decent second look if that was the only request ever made and then it was denied and Q immediately popped up...

Apophenia (/æpoʊˈfiːniə/) is the tendency to mistakenly perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things. ... Apophenia has come to imply a universal human tendency to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling.

Q would be sad at just how much insane amounts of time we waste on meaningless things and sometimes even things that Q has already completely debunked in several cases lately... They gave us so much information already that one could research for the rest of their life and never even scratch the surface, and yet many of our members waste almost all of their time on completely meaningless things, many previously debunked things, or stuff that has already been completely and thoroughly researched by people much smarter than us on 8chan, 4chan, and elsewhere over the past 4 years.

0
2

[–] Jfunction 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Pseudo-intellectualism at a low ebb. Is it your argument that there are no JFK connections to be pursued? Sorry bud, you can't get there from here.

1
0

[–] ghost_of_aswartz 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

He didn't make a connection. He described a timeline. Something happened. 2 days later something else happened. That's a timeline, not a connection. If you made a connection, you have your own apophenia to blame, you penisblood sucking skincrab

0
0

[–] redtoe_skipper ago 

I notice your frustration, as if the level of your views equal being fully awake. If that is the case, how is it that you fail to account for difference in level of learning? Or is your level of being Awake something innate to you? Instead, you sound off like my aunt talking about by deceased father: your father would be sad. Your father would be proud, Your father would be ... blabla. This is shaming or validating using a straw man, as it is as hypothetical as they come. And you are setting yourself up as the one true authority on what Q feels? Wait: you know how 11 people feel at this very moment?

I would even say: you are employing the true Scotsman- argument.

I also note, you did not tells us why the apparent and alleged connection/ coincidence, is NOT related.

In any case, your frustration leads you to employ logical fallacies and thus, you are missing the mark completely. There is still much you have to learn. So, pipe down, take a breath, a beer, and rethink your strategy.

0
2

[–] USAMatters 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Very interesting. In another post today there is a story on StemExpress admits to keeping babies alive so that whole, beating hearts and heads can be harvested.

We know about hrc and her need to sacrifice babies and children. We have heard about her "snuff" video where huma & hrc horribly murdered a young girl. We know about Podesta's sick activities. We know about the holocaust.

We know about Soros causing mass migration to ruin countries.

We know the dems are only interested in getting votes and not the well being of the US citizens.

We know about the world trade centers and Kate Stanley and the horror of Parkland shooting created by obama.

How much worse can things be - at what point are these people taken in for their crimes??

1
-1

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Good question. I guess President Trump doesn't want to be the CAUSE of any hysteria, but we do deal with so much.

Q is right though when he says things need to be in place in order for the EVIL PEOPLE to be put away, or they will just get back out if there are evil judges etc.

If you read the book "The Inheritance" you see how much evil there is with people that SHOULD BE GOOD, but aren't.

So much has to be fixed.

0
1

[–] USAMatters 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Agree -

0
5

[–] Jfunction 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

It's all unconstitutional. The public is being deceived about certain acts of the people it elected. The deception is being done by the elected for the purpose of protecting their jobs and reputations and the jobs and reputations of foreign governments. Stripped of spin that's what it comes down to.

Congress cannot legislate itself the right to withhold improperly classified information from the electorate. They invoke a "gravity" determination which is just an opinion with a suit on. Any President of any stripe can render any such opinion that suits his purposes. Will that make his decision to withhold improperly classified documents Constitutional?

The JFK files are being withheld from the public to hide criminal activity by elected officials, agencies and some private citizens. There isn't anything proper about withholding that information. Will it lead to distrust of our government? One hopes so. Is that dangerous? For the government agencies and criminals, probably it is. Why then did Trump do what he did? Who's William Barr? What was Barr's connection to 9/11? Why aren't they moving to drain the swamp?

I, and many others, want all the JFK files, all 9/11 and FISA declassified forthwith. Doing so will wrest control of the "narrative" from the DS. The best way to inform the uninformed it to show them the plain facts.

1
0

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I agree. What can WE do though?

0
2

[–] ghost_of_aswartz 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

We can all, as in the entire country, agree to immediately stop working until the files are a released. They'd be released in about 3-5 days

People could do sick leave or vacation or say you're in an accident. Employers would know it's a ruse, but legally cannot do anything to you

0
1

[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Also remember that Q emerged in the aftermath of the Las Vegas event. Personally I do not buy Q's version that this was a "failed attempt" on the president involving a Saudi prince

There is ample evidence that this entire production was a hoax in which no one died. Fake victims and obituaries. Obvious crisis actors. Sheriff Lombardo caught in multiple lies. Medical Examiner lying. Hospitals lying. Corrupt FBI releasing a bullshit "report"

I just don't buy it

0
2

[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

What makes you think one op cannot be disguised in another?

The people acting on these issues are not like you and me. For us, most things if not all, are really straight forward in an either/ or situation. They grey area is reasonably small. You need a certain twist in your brain. This is about appearances, manipulation, entrapment, etc.

Even Q said, not all they were doing would be clean. War is dirty. It necessitates disguise.

Information, being a piece of data or an act, may be true or fake. If fake, then it still can be true, as it value is in the reason why the fake was done. This is the world of shadows.

Then there is another, may be even disquieting thought: if you wanne win, you want to win with full spectrum domination. It means you will time each and any piece of data, so it works to your advantage. If you want your enemy to fall, you want to have them fall from as high up as you can manipulate them, in the nick of time.

Consider a tennis match. If the opponent is too strong from the get go, it simply is game set match. But a more enticing and entertaining match is one where the tension regarding a win is in play.

I play this game while playing tennis. It is fun. Especially, when I play against opponents who claim to be people not having a problem with losing..... hahaha, you should see their frustration. And the more frustrated they get, the more mistakes they make, the easier the game gets. But ... the game must be played, till the arbiter declares: game, set, match.

A tennis match is just small stuff, compared to what Q+ is doing.

As towards LV: people react to noise (sound of shots) and what they see: the appearance of wounds .... Another thought: what if there was a mix: one or two were actually wounded, surrounded by crisis actors to provoke an effect?

How do you escape best? When things are orderly? Or when things are in disarray and panic?

What happens when one op goes south? How do you stop-gap that? How do you tie off?

When an operator turns out to be a [C]lown, which side is he on? Does he even know which side was manipulating him? What was the op really about?

I have many questions, and suspicious as to any official narrative, because there are too many pieces not fitting in place.

0
2

[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Being from the Netherlands you should investigate Anders Breivik. Another false flag hoax

http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2016/04/anders-breivik-omar-bin-laden-adam-lanza.html

0
3

[–] littlestown 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

A thought on this... "He ordered the CIA and other agencies to take yet another look at each blacked-out section of their documents during the next three years to see what more can be released." One thing this does is it forces new eyes to see it.

1
-1

[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

That's so true. Good point. Hopefully we will eventually get to know more.

load more comments ▼ (5 remaining)