[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The JFK records were released though. Maybe not all, but something like 20k pages were released.
It's how we know that there were 2 separate warnings of the assassination attempt by military intelligence before it occurred.
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yes, But LOTS left out.
Christopher Fulton even has more evidence.
[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't know what's left out so can't say if it's lots, or just tidbits of information that ties it all together.
[–] CMAnon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I hope Trump's reasoning involved his own plans to beat the deep state and to uncover the JFK material beforehand would interfere with what he and the Q team are working on. Maybe their release will be included in the evidence used at the big take down trials? Can't let the cat out of the bag too soon.
[–] candtalan 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If truth so strongly implicates sec. services, and more, then a full exposure will be subject to strong pushback, retaliation, maybe overly spiteful. If the snakes are in process of being chopped up in the swamp then enough body-less heads may still exist to do needless damage at this time. And are all the stones actually known, which harbour nasty critters beneath? Jog the stones, set fires for a few, flood a few etc etc. And see quite what pops out? My guess is we are a long ways down the good road, and hasty urges, very understandable, may risk collateral hurt, which is yet unnecessary
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Thanks for the good reply.
[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Thank you for posting this.
It is interesting to contemplate what could be in the files that would present harm to National security or foreign relations concerning an event that happened 56 years ago ....
And what makes the passage of 3 years (10-26-2017 -> 10-26-2020 (right before the elections?) of such profound impact that certain details cannot be released ... yet.
It sound like relating to the question: WHO are still alive?
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You are welcome. Good Point. Who would still be alive? President Trump must know the TRUTH now.
[–] littlestown 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
A thought on this... "He ordered the CIA and other agencies to take yet another look at each blacked-out section of their documents during the next three years to see what more can be released." One thing this does is it forces new eyes to see it.
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
That's so true. Good point. Hopefully we will eventually get to know more.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Also remember that Q emerged in the aftermath of the Las Vegas event. Personally I do not buy Q's version that this was a "failed attempt" on the president involving a Saudi prince
There is ample evidence that this entire production was a hoax in which no one died. Fake victims and obituaries. Obvious crisis actors. Sheriff Lombardo caught in multiple lies. Medical Examiner lying. Hospitals lying. Corrupt FBI releasing a bullshit "report"
I just don't buy it
[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What makes you think one op cannot be disguised in another?
The people acting on these issues are not like you and me. For us, most things if not all, are really straight forward in an either/ or situation. They grey area is reasonably small. You need a certain twist in your brain. This is about appearances, manipulation, entrapment, etc.
Even Q said, not all they were doing would be clean. War is dirty. It necessitates disguise.
Information, being a piece of data or an act, may be true or fake. If fake, then it still can be true, as it value is in the reason why the fake was done. This is the world of shadows.
Then there is another, may be even disquieting thought: if you wanne win, you want to win with full spectrum domination. It means you will time each and any piece of data, so it works to your advantage. If you want your enemy to fall, you want to have them fall from as high up as you can manipulate them, in the nick of time.
Consider a tennis match. If the opponent is too strong from the get go, it simply is game set match. But a more enticing and entertaining match is one where the tension regarding a win is in play.
I play this game while playing tennis. It is fun. Especially, when I play against opponents who claim to be people not having a problem with losing..... hahaha, you should see their frustration. And the more frustrated they get, the more mistakes they make, the easier the game gets. But ... the game must be played, till the arbiter declares: game, set, match.
A tennis match is just small stuff, compared to what Q+ is doing.
As towards LV: people react to noise (sound of shots) and what they see: the appearance of wounds .... Another thought: what if there was a mix: one or two were actually wounded, surrounded by crisis actors to provoke an effect?
How do you escape best? When things are orderly? Or when things are in disarray and panic?
What happens when one op goes south? How do you stop-gap that? How do you tie off?
When an operator turns out to be a [C]lown, which side is he on? Does he even know which side was manipulating him? What was the op really about?
I have many questions, and suspicious as to any official narrative, because there are too many pieces not fitting in place.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Being from the Netherlands you should investigate Anders Breivik. Another false flag hoax
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2016/04/anders-breivik-omar-bin-laden-adam-lanza.html
[–] Jfunction 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
It's all unconstitutional. The public is being deceived about certain acts of the people it elected. The deception is being done by the elected for the purpose of protecting their jobs and reputations and the jobs and reputations of foreign governments. Stripped of spin that's what it comes down to.
Congress cannot legislate itself the right to withhold improperly classified information from the electorate. They invoke a "gravity" determination which is just an opinion with a suit on. Any President of any stripe can render any such opinion that suits his purposes. Will that make his decision to withhold improperly classified documents Constitutional?
The JFK files are being withheld from the public to hide criminal activity by elected officials, agencies and some private citizens. There isn't anything proper about withholding that information. Will it lead to distrust of our government? One hopes so. Is that dangerous? For the government agencies and criminals, probably it is. Why then did Trump do what he did? Who's William Barr? What was Barr's connection to 9/11? Why aren't they moving to drain the swamp?
I, and many others, want all the JFK files, all 9/11 and FISA declassified forthwith. Doing so will wrest control of the "narrative" from the DS. The best way to inform the uninformed it to show them the plain facts.
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
I agree. What can WE do though?
[–] ghost_of_aswartz 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
We can all, as in the entire country, agree to immediately stop working until the files are a released. They'd be released in about 3-5 days
People could do sick leave or vacation or say you're in an accident. Employers would know it's a ruse, but legally cannot do anything to you
[–] SouthDakotaVet 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In 2021 the last pages will get released. This is just a General search result. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=jfk+files+2021&atb=v106-1&ia=web
[–] Lauraingalls [S] ago
Thanks.