[–] SouthDakotaVet 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
In 2021 the last pages will get released. This is just a General search result. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=jfk+files+2021&atb=v106-1&ia=web
[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
The JFK records were released though. Maybe not all, but something like 20k pages were released.
It's how we know that there were 2 separate warnings of the assassination attempt by military intelligence before it occurred.
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Yes, But LOTS left out.
Christopher Fulton even has more evidence.
[–] GoodGodKirk 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
I don't know what's left out so can't say if it's lots, or just tidbits of information that ties it all together.
[–] candtalan 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
If truth so strongly implicates sec. services, and more, then a full exposure will be subject to strong pushback, retaliation, maybe overly spiteful. If the snakes are in process of being chopped up in the swamp then enough body-less heads may still exist to do needless damage at this time. And are all the stones actually known, which harbour nasty critters beneath? Jog the stones, set fires for a few, flood a few etc etc. And see quite what pops out? My guess is we are a long ways down the good road, and hasty urges, very understandable, may risk collateral hurt, which is yet unnecessary
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
Thanks for the good reply.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Also remember that Q emerged in the aftermath of the Las Vegas event. Personally I do not buy Q's version that this was a "failed attempt" on the president involving a Saudi prince
There is ample evidence that this entire production was a hoax in which no one died. Fake victims and obituaries. Obvious crisis actors. Sheriff Lombardo caught in multiple lies. Medical Examiner lying. Hospitals lying. Corrupt FBI releasing a bullshit "report"
I just don't buy it
[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
What makes you think one op cannot be disguised in another?
The people acting on these issues are not like you and me. For us, most things if not all, are really straight forward in an either/ or situation. They grey area is reasonably small. You need a certain twist in your brain. This is about appearances, manipulation, entrapment, etc.
Even Q said, not all they were doing would be clean. War is dirty. It necessitates disguise.
Information, being a piece of data or an act, may be true or fake. If fake, then it still can be true, as it value is in the reason why the fake was done. This is the world of shadows.
Then there is another, may be even disquieting thought: if you wanne win, you want to win with full spectrum domination. It means you will time each and any piece of data, so it works to your advantage. If you want your enemy to fall, you want to have them fall from as high up as you can manipulate them, in the nick of time.
Consider a tennis match. If the opponent is too strong from the get go, it simply is game set match. But a more enticing and entertaining match is one where the tension regarding a win is in play.
I play this game while playing tennis. It is fun. Especially, when I play against opponents who claim to be people not having a problem with losing..... hahaha, you should see their frustration. And the more frustrated they get, the more mistakes they make, the easier the game gets. But ... the game must be played, till the arbiter declares: game, set, match.
A tennis match is just small stuff, compared to what Q+ is doing.
As towards LV: people react to noise (sound of shots) and what they see: the appearance of wounds .... Another thought: what if there was a mix: one or two were actually wounded, surrounded by crisis actors to provoke an effect?
How do you escape best? When things are orderly? Or when things are in disarray and panic?
What happens when one op goes south? How do you stop-gap that? How do you tie off?
When an operator turns out to be a [C]lown, which side is he on? Does he even know which side was manipulating him? What was the op really about?
I have many questions, and suspicious as to any official narrative, because there are too many pieces not fitting in place.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Being from the Netherlands you should investigate Anders Breivik. Another false flag hoax
http://aanirfan.blogspot.com/2016/04/anders-breivik-omar-bin-laden-adam-lanza.html
[–] redtoe_skipper 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Thank you for posting this.
It is interesting to contemplate what could be in the files that would present harm to National security or foreign relations concerning an event that happened 56 years ago ....
And what makes the passage of 3 years (10-26-2017 -> 10-26-2020 (right before the elections?) of such profound impact that certain details cannot be released ... yet.
It sound like relating to the question: WHO are still alive?
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
You are welcome. Good Point. Who would still be alive? President Trump must know the TRUTH now.
[–] USAMatters 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
Very interesting. In another post today there is a story on StemExpress admits to keeping babies alive so that whole, beating hearts and heads can be harvested.
We know about hrc and her need to sacrifice babies and children. We have heard about her "snuff" video where huma & hrc horribly murdered a young girl. We know about Podesta's sick activities. We know about the holocaust.
We know about Soros causing mass migration to ruin countries.
We know the dems are only interested in getting votes and not the well being of the US citizens.
We know about the world trade centers and Kate Stanley and the horror of Parkland shooting created by obama.
How much worse can things be - at what point are these people taken in for their crimes??
[–] Lauraingalls [S] 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Good question. I guess President Trump doesn't want to be the CAUSE of any hysteria, but we do deal with so much.
Q is right though when he says things need to be in place in order for the EVIL PEOPLE to be put away, or they will just get back out if there are evil judges etc.
If you read the book "The Inheritance" you see how much evil there is with people that SHOULD BE GOOD, but aren't.
So much has to be fixed.
[–] CMAnon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
I hope Trump's reasoning involved his own plans to beat the deep state and to uncover the JFK material beforehand would interfere with what he and the Q team are working on. Maybe their release will be included in the evidence used at the big take down trials? Can't let the cat out of the bag too soon.
[–] DickTick 3 points -2 points 1 point (+1|-3) ago
What are you even talking about? This shit has been tried and denied many times. It just so happens Q popped up after that particular request denial... This would only be worth a decent second look if that was the only request ever made and then it was denied and Q immediately popped up...
Apophenia (/æpoʊˈfiːniə/) is the tendency to mistakenly perceive connections and meaning between unrelated things. ... Apophenia has come to imply a universal human tendency to seek patterns in random information, such as gambling.
Q would be sad at just how much insane amounts of time we waste on meaningless things and sometimes even things that Q has already completely debunked in several cases lately... They gave us so much information already that one could research for the rest of their life and never even scratch the surface, and yet many of our members waste almost all of their time on completely meaningless things, many previously debunked things, or stuff that has already been completely and thoroughly researched by people much smarter than us on 8chan, 4chan, and elsewhere over the past 4 years.
[–] redtoe_skipper ago
I notice your frustration, as if the level of your views equal being fully awake. If that is the case, how is it that you fail to account for difference in level of learning? Or is your level of being Awake something innate to you? Instead, you sound off like my aunt talking about by deceased father: your father would be sad. Your father would be proud, Your father would be ... blabla. This is shaming or validating using a straw man, as it is as hypothetical as they come. And you are setting yourself up as the one true authority on what Q feels? Wait: you know how 11 people feel at this very moment?
I would even say: you are employing the true Scotsman- argument.
I also note, you did not tells us why the apparent and alleged connection/ coincidence, is NOT related.
In any case, your frustration leads you to employ logical fallacies and thus, you are missing the mark completely. There is still much you have to learn. So, pipe down, take a breath, a beer, and rethink your strategy.
[–] ghost_of_aswartz 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
He didn't make a connection. He described a timeline. Something happened. 2 days later something else happened. That's a timeline, not a connection. If you made a connection, you have your own apophenia to blame, you penisblood sucking skincrab
[–] Jfunction 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Pseudo-intellectualism at a low ebb. Is it your argument that there are no JFK connections to be pursued? Sorry bud, you can't get there from here.