1
0

[–] Niggardly_Jew 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

The fundamental problem with this line of reasoning is the implication that "good ideas" are "good" for everyone.

If two people are starving on a desert island with a single banana, there's no "good idea" that will change either's interest from eating the banana, at the expense of the other's life if necessary.

"Good ideas" that lead to an increase in the white birthrate are incongruent with "good ideas" about instituting a worldwide jewish hegemony. Both ideas serve the interests of the people who support those ideas.

TL;DR

You can't convince jews that they shouldn't genocide white people if it implies giving up their power (or is otherwise against their interests).

0
1

[–] 7e62ce85 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You can't convince jews that they shouldn't genocide white people

This is what self-defense is for.

If two people are starving on a desert island with a single banana, there's no "good idea" that will change either's interest from eating the banana, at the expense of the other's life if necessary.

Building a raft?

Besides extreme situations aren't all that relevant because you will be fucked no matter what.

0
2

[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

what? property rights require force and so does htis forum, the force of electromagnetism!

0
1

[–] 7e62ce85 [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Okay okay existence itself is violent, generally speaking it should be minimized.