Before women were given the vote nationwide nj did let women vote if they were land owners. I get it exceptions exist but part of my point is that line of argument is a slippery slope. It's either all or none unless we use something else to gain the right to vote. Families, veterans, business owners or land owners. One person one vote is fake and gay.
Right. Now that the slope has been slipped down, we can't take the vote away from lazy bums, gold digging bimbos or a rich kids living in their parents' basements. You can't force people to contribute to society, then they shouldn't be able to force their ideas on how things are run with an equal vote. We can't really walk this back, now.
[–] lion4liberty 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Before women were given the vote nationwide nj did let women vote if they were land owners. I get it exceptions exist but part of my point is that line of argument is a slippery slope. It's either all or none unless we use something else to gain the right to vote. Families, veterans, business owners or land owners. One person one vote is fake and gay.
[–] QueenB 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
Right. Now that the slope has been slipped down, we can't take the vote away from lazy bums, gold digging bimbos or a rich kids living in their parents' basements. You can't force people to contribute to society, then they shouldn't be able to force their ideas on how things are run with an equal vote. We can't really walk this back, now.