0
61

[–] downton-stabby 0 points 61 points (+61|-0) ago 

Hate speech is protected speech. No one cares about approved speech.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
7

[–] d33t 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago  (edited ago)

The use of the word "platforms" suggests that, although the US did not commit to this provision on the government level, social media platforms have committed on the private level.

0
3

[–] u_r_wat_u_eat 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

How is this crook even still in office? Are the French yellow vests really that fucking useless? They've been protesting for like 40 weeks and still can't get that jew loving faggot kicked out..?

0
0

[–] 20346720? ago 

Expanding the definition of slander/libel to include unjust defamation of a group of people would help. For example, the rhetoric common to the 6 media corps causes real harm to the property (safety, employability, stable prices of goods and services, ...) of white people.

Take everything they have earned from it, give it to the people who were defamed (if only a class action didn't go straight to lawyers).

0
32

[–] tokgroid 0 points 32 points (+32|-0) ago 

We have to refuse. Mainly because we have the 1st amendment, and additionally because we aren't beholden to European fag laws.

[–] [deleted] 1 point 24 points (+25|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
12

[–] Heer_me_roar 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago  (edited ago)

“It’s fine when they blatantly attack you and yours though“

0
16

[–] wholesome_optics 0 points 16 points (+16|-0) ago 

Funny title... "Charter for an Open, Free, and Safe Internet". Yet there must be laws that prevent all of that according to this French psycho.

0
12

[–] privacy_first 0 points 12 points (+12|-0) ago 

standard Orwell 1984 language, the words says the opposite of the meaning.

0
4

[–] u_r_wat_u_eat 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Open to discuss what we allow you to discuss, free to live within our parameters and held safe from the truth

0
8

[–] Gorillion 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Lol, faggots. I hate them.

0
7

[–] CheeseboogerHimself 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

anyone in the US who signs it will be guilty of crimes against the Constitution and may be arrested later by militias.

0
1

[–] hollandkt 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If only! I believe with all my heart that a judgement day is coming, but I don't think we will see it.

0
6

[–] XSS1337 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

Fuck shit cock balls spic micks niggers kikes chinks cracker goat fucking muslim child rapist Muhammad boy lovers....

Marbury v. Madison

0
3

[–] udo 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

IT DEFINES CRIMINAL HATE THOUGHT as any non-muslim discussing the Muslim Religion factually! (Muhammad having 6 year old sex slave wife Aisha)

[EU court already ruled on this and its a closed issue for non-muslims, UN also has a pending international treaty]

IT DEFINES CRIMINAL HATE THOUGHT as anyone using scientific data of IQ AVERAGES to Proves Blacks have dramatically lower IQs !

IT essentially DEFINES CRIMINAL HATE THOUGHT as anyone questioning "Diversity is Our Strength" ™ © ®

[many arrested in UK and France and Germany for merely stating (while being white)... THAT THINGS WERE BETTER BEFORE ALL THE AFRICAN IMMIGRANTS!] ARRESTS!

Signing this thing would be something a leftist would want.

Leftists ideas and policies do not work and cannot ever survive free and open debate or a free press.

Who the fuck would ever want free speech countries to sign away their basic freedom of thought?!

0
0

[–] KebabAndNoseRemoval ago 

Funny thing is these retard Jews don't think we'll convert to Islam just to beat them.

0
1

[–] hollandkt 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

That's one thing I will never do. Deus Vult baby.

load more comments ▼ (12 remaining)