1
23

[–] Feldorai 1 point 23 points (+24|-1) ago 

Women would not "need" Maternity Leave if they'd stay in the home and been a Home Maker, tending to the house, children, and her husband.

This is not bullshitting either when I say this. If the 100% majority of women all decided at the same time to up & quit their jobs & even their successful businesses, with absolutely zero intentions to return, leaving only men to take up those jobs and successful businesses, wages would go up incredibly, even for minimum wage jobs working at a grocery store just bagging groceries you would likely see your wage go up to something like $21 per hour, and that's not an exaggeration. Women who decided to quit working and decided to go back to taking on a Home Maker role & learned Home Economic skills instead, would definitely seek those men as marriage material. Those same women are just as co-dependent in the work place as they ever were when they used to apply themselves as Home Makers -- Feminism lied to them, they are definitely neither independent, nor are they empowered, they still seek companionship, co-dependence, and empowerment -- they lost their empowerment the moment they decided to give Feminism and getting a job a try. They're more miserable having a job than they ever were as a Home Maker.

1
11

[–] irelandLost 1 point 11 points (+12|-1) ago 

It’s not even about wages increasing at such rates, rather the impact on cost of living. If single income families are the standard then a home will be affordable on a single income, but if even a relatively small percentage of couples are double income then the price of houses increases sharply which then forces many women who would rather stay at home into the workplace in order to compete with the double income families for necessities like housing. Same principle applies to most necessities and quite a few luxuries.

0
1

[–] kidcip16 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

If there were less single moms, you'd have bigger families sharing a home too. Which means less demand for homes and lower prices.

0
1

[–] PewterKey 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Does China have a law against firing pregnant or married women? I'd bet money that married women get fired if they employer thinks she's trying to have her baby. And Chinese bosses likely would tell you to "abort your baby and get back to work you whore".

1
2

[–] TheSeer 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

Although of course those over 200 lbs from their office job are gonna struggle with Home Ec... And finding a man. Just saw someone the other day. Could have been decent if not good looking, if not for 60-70 extra pounds! At under 25 y.o!

0
1

[–] TheTrigger 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Hedonism: first it giveth, then it taketh away.

0
6

[–] AbbeyGator 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I think some women who grew up with divorced parents are afraid to depend on a man. Women are way more neurotic and afraid than men, and many of them fear being left out in the cold. Divorce is too easy and too socially acceptable. Then there are social safety nets making it possible to raise kids (barely) in a single parent family, and women actually do this rather than stay married. If the tax deduction for kids were actually reasonable compared to what it costs to raise them, I think more women would stay home. Just some random thoughts.

0
0

[–] andrew_jackson ago 

Yes, I think that Christians ought to band together into communities to share child bearing costs.

1 reply

0
33

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 33 points (+33|-0) ago 

Jews: "Wah, let's get women in the work force so we can tax both genders and pay them less."

Women get kids

Jews: "Wah. Women don't have enough money to support their kids."

I fucking hate jews. Fuck you Bernie.

0
24

[–] blatent101 0 points 24 points (+24|-0) ago 

"Let's give women the right to vote." - Every Western country about 100 years before their collapse

1
3

[–] Zoldam 1 point 3 points (+4|-1) ago 

Benefits of women in the workforce, for those in power (kike or not).

1: Bigger tax base, thus more income.

2: Bigger worker supply, thus they can be payed less.

3: Children must be put in public institutions from a young age, thus may be indoctrinated.

4: Does not encourage motherhood and by extension the nuclear family, something that offers rival authority to the state.

5: Gives women more political power and influence, which means a larger base that is easily manipulable.

0
1

[–] Leveraction 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

God, i love James Wood!!!!

4
-4

0
0

[–] LaRiver ago 

If the likes of Sanders get their way, we will have a "AmeriCom" situation at hand.

5
-3

[–] hankylanky 5 points -3 points (+2|-5) ago 

I forgot he was banned. But then, he's used to being forgotten. He can add "forgotten tweeter" to "forgotten pock-marked asshole" and "forgotten actor." But the worst thing about this tweet is that he didn't even see the irony of what he was saying. His statement only supports Bernie's about China's record on human rights. Bernie is correctly contrasting that with the fact that even China has better maternity laws.

0
2

[–] Leonidas4Q 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Yankylanky, does the selective abortion of 35 million chinese baby girls not concern you? James Woods is an intelligent American patriot. Your slurs against him reflect badly on you. not him. Bernie is rarely if ever correct. You, sir, have much to learn.

0
0

[–] MurkSquatch ago 

I've never worked for a company that doesn't offer a shitload of maternity leave.

0
0

[–] obvious-throwaway- ago 

Did James Woods get suicides for wrongthink or just unperssoned by (((big tech)))?

load more comments ▼ (11 remaining)