[–] QCrumbCatcher 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
We. Might. Have. An. Arrest. Or. GTFO. Moment.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
May Be
About To Indict
in the last stages of making a decision
on whether [or not] to indict Andrew McCabe
people familiar with recent developments
The person would not detail the discussions
This is shitty journalism. But a great example of clickbait
[–] fireantsinyourpants 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
BREAKING: The Dept of Justice declined to indict McCabe and Strzok because they said they didn't know, they didn't mean it, and they promised never to do whatever it was that happened ever again.
[–] PeggyGilmour 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Yes. Isn't there a sealed inditement for him as well as 120,000 more?
[–] AlphabeticalAnon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
To indict, or not to indict. That is the question.
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the image of corrupt pieces of shit as the public uses slings and arrows knowing of our outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and do the right thing by putting an end to the shitstains who should be rotting in prison.
[–] numina18 0 points 5 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago
You CAN'T indict Andy: He works for CNN now!!
[–] fireantsinyourpants 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
When does he start his run for pres?
[–] Sanpa33 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
That first Amendment isn't a free get out of jail card, plus, it would be the cherry on top to storm into CNN's offices with the swat team for an arrest.