0
5

[–] numina18 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

You CAN'T indict Andy: He works for CNN now!!

0
2

[–] fireantsinyourpants 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

When does he start his run for pres?

0
2

[–] Sanpa33 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

That first Amendment isn't a free get out of jail card, plus, it would be the cherry on top to storm into CNN's offices with the swat team for an arrest.

0
1

[–] QCrumbCatcher 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

We. Might. Have. An. Arrest. Or. GTFO. Moment.

0
3

[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

May Be

About To Indict

in the last stages of making a decision

on whether [or not] to indict Andrew McCabe

people familiar with recent developments

The person would not detail the discussions

This is shitty journalism. But a great example of clickbait

0
7

[–] fireantsinyourpants 0 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago 

BREAKING: The Dept of Justice declined to indict McCabe and Strzok because they said they didn't know, they didn't mean it, and they promised never to do whatever it was that happened ever again.

0
1

[–] stormymonday 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Not going to happen

0
1

[–] PeggyGilmour 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Yes. Isn't there a sealed inditement for him as well as 120,000 more?

0
3

[–] AlphabeticalAnon 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

To indict, or not to indict. That is the question.

Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the image of corrupt pieces of shit as the public uses slings and arrows knowing of our outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and do the right thing by putting an end to the shitstains who should be rotting in prison.

0
2

[–] Woelf3 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

If he walks ... I walk ... !?

load more comments ▼ (14 remaining)