[–] TheBRAINz 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This story might just explain McCabe's sudden CNN gig, giving him a regular public platform to do damage control or rehab on his public image ahead of an indictment. Harder to get a decent jury to convict a celebrity or media person who appears likable, ala OJ Simpson. Just a thought.
P.S.- Shout out to the many nay saying shills showing up in this thread! Pain is coming! MAGA
[–] AlphabeticalAnon 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
To indict, or not to indict. That is the question.
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer the image of corrupt pieces of shit as the public uses slings and arrows knowing of our outrageous fortune, or to take arms against a sea of troubles and do the right thing by putting an end to the shitstains who should be rotting in prison.
[–] Lurky_McLurkmoar 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
May Be
About To Indict
in the last stages of making a decision
on whether [or not] to indict Andrew McCabe
people familiar with recent developments
The person would not detail the discussions
This is shitty journalism. But a great example of clickbait
[–] AshesAshes 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
When should I start to think about considering to prepare to begin to start worrying about this.
[–] fireantsinyourpants 0 points 3 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago
Well, its a totally definite possible maybe, so I'm standing by to stand by.
[–] MingDynasty 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
Just like they did comey, right? DOJ will decline again, just like they will decline for all protected perps.