0
30

[–] mleczko 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

If thought is not a crime how come hate is?

0
15

[–] uvulectomy 0 points 15 points (+15|-0) ago 

Sounds like you've had a little too much to think, slave citizen.

0
2

[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

slave=citizen

just ask the IRS when you leave USA

0
11

[–] tastywhitemeat 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

The problem is, pedos don't just think about it. They are compelled to act on - and eventually to act out - their perversions.

If it were possible for a pedo to just have the fantasy, inside his head, and never search for any fulfillment of that fantasy, then it wouldn't be a crime. But that's not how sexual deviance works. By definition, a pedo is a criminal in search of a victim.

0
5

[–] Acerphoon 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

Exactly.

If a pedo really only had fantasies but never acted on it, then people wouldn't even know that he had such thoughts.

0
0

[–] MDEneverdies1488 ago  (edited ago)

I'm not defending pedos, just expressing that your logic is flawed. We've all thought about gassing 6 million kikes, but none of us have acted on it. And we all know that we think about it

0
4

[–] Krusty-Q 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

String them up!

0
3

[–] GreenSlug 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Thoughts arnt crimes, and what is or isnt a crime has no bearing on morality. It is immoral to be attracted to children, still doesnt make thoughts crimes, even though being attracted to children should get ya hanged. The anarcho pedophile equated morality with crime, as though they only view morality as what is legal or illegal, and they being anarcho, want everything to be legal, thus revealing their true nature, they have no morals

0
1

[–] J_Darnley 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You beat me to it, and said it better. I was going to say "Nice gotcha in the poll. Attraction to children is immoral (to many) but it isn't a crime."

0
2

[–] AlexanderMorose13 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I'd be very much at peace during times of anarchy. Mostly because all the smart criminals would kill all the stupid people like this guy and leave me alone because they're smart enough to know that I'm not worth the effort.

0
0

[–] vonbacon ago 

Still have to worry about niggers though.

If anarchy breaks out your better have some white friends hang with,

0
0

[–] AlexanderMorose13 ago 

I only have white friends to hang with. Some Asian and Venezuelan too. Basically, everyone smart enough to understand that communism is a good reason to be armed.

1
2

[–] Eualos 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

It's not a thought crime when you act on your feelings or try to make it acceptable

[–] [deleted] 1 point 4 points (+5|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] freshmeat 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

they have been doing this for literally 5 years, thank god the normies are starting to understand

0
1

[–] Ocelot 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yes, because all beliefs inevitably affect one's actions even if not consciously DIRECTLY acted upon. For example, his "attraction to children which he never acts upon" (which is a lie) leads him to push for acceptance and, even if he hypothetically never harmed children (another lie), other pedophiles would then be freer to act upon their vile urges.

Holding immoral beliefs leads to immorality. Evil does not have to be active to be evil.

Discussing this is pointless anyways. Either way he's a pervert, and perverts should be hanged.

3
1

[–] Neon_Scrotum 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

If actual honest to god anarchy happened, everybody's life would be in danger. In fact, I'd say that's almost the definition of anarchy.

1
5

[–] Planetoftheclown 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago  (edited ago)

You're looking at this from the wrong perspective. Take the west when it was just territories. "Law" was very localized if not non-existent, see Deadwood, SD.

Civilized humans living in groups universally recognize basic socially accepted behavior you can think of as "laws" without having it codified or enforced by a government, don't steal, don't murder, don't fuck children.

While there may be anarchy and different factions might clash, the group is going to recognize a modicum of civilized behavior out of necessity. Such groups will form spontaneously and randomly.

One of the first things these groups are going to do is kill any motherfucker who fucks their children. So the kiddy diddlers are going to be particularly vulnerable in an anarchy. So are the fags and the trans-freaks simply because resources are going to be scarce and ain't nobody going to put up with the expense of their drama and bullshit. You better contribute and procreate to grow the group.

0
3

[–] HRCisDONE 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

This 100% ONLY works if there is ethnic and racial homogeneity. Diversity causes this to go out the window. Why do you think diversity is pushed so hard?

For all lurking newfags, diversity is a cancer pushed by the Jews to destroy society from within.

1. http://magaimg.net/img/7gcn.png

2. http://magaimg.net/img/7gbx.png

3. http://magaimg.net/img/7gby.jpg

4. http://magaimg.net/img/7gcb.jpg

The United States was always intended to be an ethnostate, and not the melting pot that Jews popularized,

 http://magaimg.net/img/7w6n.jpg

 until JFK and LBJ gave them civil rights in exchange for them not destroying the country for the (((communists))).

 http://magaimg.net/img/7ik5.jpg

Read these pics on diversity and the numerous studies done that find diversity is extremely destructive to a country. In addition, diversity always leads to races mixing, which is incredibly damaging physically, psychologically, and emotionally to the off spring. This is the Jewish end game which again, Harvard proved this true.

 Harvard interracial study https://scholar.harvard.edu/files/fryer/files/plight_of_mixed_race.pdf

 Harvard diversity study https://macaulay.cuny.edu/eportfolios/benediktsson2013/files/2013/04/Putnam.pdf

Harvard proved it's toxicity. Normie fags cannot deny these studies.

interracial and diversity study dump.  https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/184904374/

Normie tier Diversity meme dump https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/203799081/

Normie tier interracial meme dump https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/203814654/

Race Mixing Memes

Mixed Race Adult Characteristics http://magaimg.net/img/7ijq.jpg

Mixed Race Kids Propensity to Exhibit Anti-social Behavior http://magaimg.net/img/7ijr.jpg

Mixed Race Kids at Birth http://magaimg.net/img/7ijs.jpg

Mixed Race School Age Kids http://magaimg.net/img/7ijt.jpg

Mixed Race Couples http://magaimg.net/img/7iju.jpg

Attraction and Societal Cohesion is Foremost a Function of Genetics not Ideology

Sub-Saharan Brothers http://magaimg.net/img/7ijw.jpg

Increased Conception Likelihood http://magaimg.net/img/7ijx.jpg

Attraction Between Closest Friends and Spouses

http://magaimg.net/img/7ijy.jpg

Unconscious Likelihood of Adopting

http://magaimg.net/img/7ik0.jpg

Twin Study's Proofs http://magaimg.net/img/7ik1.jpg

Attraction Driven by Genetic Similarity http://magaimg.net/img/7ik2.jpg

Whites are going extinct, and why you should care.

 https://youtu.be/V5Q9S3epIDs

Whites on the chopping block. The Jewish lead genocide.

 https://youtu.be/kbqq5JHUolk

0
0

[–] High_Sierra_Trail ago 

You obviously don't get the concept.

1
0

[–] bbqchipz 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Do you need laws to be a decent person? If honest to god anarchy happened it could be peaceful too. You don't need laws and rules to be a decent person. The definition of Anarchy is to be without Laws or an established order. It says nothing about chaos.

0
2

[–] Neon_Scrotum 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

It's basically true that good, kind, decent people don't need laws to make them be that way, but no group of people is ever entirely composed of good people. There are always bad people and even truly evil people. Laws are a means, however flawed, of protecting good people from bad people. Without laws, in a state of anarchy, the only thing protecting good people from bad people are guns, i.e. the willingness to do violence. The problem with that is that bad people have guns too, and are a lot more willing to do violence than good people. And once you get enough people willing to do violence, things just get very precarious. Having an idealistic outlook does not prevent bullets from killing you. Your rosy view of the state of anarchy won't mean shit to some low-I.Q. uneducated thug with a .45 pointed at your head and nothing preventing him from pulling the trigger except your hopeful belief in his good nature.

0
0

[–] Fetalpig ago 

Yes,yes you do. My neighbor would steal my shit in an instant. The only thing that is keeping him decent is my ammo,he is perfectly aware of my aim,and my conviction to keep my items mine.

0
0

[–] Grospoliner ago 

Are niggers decent people? The answer is no and you're fucking retarded for even entertaining the notion that anarchy is anything but violent.

0
0

[–] Adminstrater ago 

We create restrictions by nature. Actions having consequences is a learned behavior. We don't need to live in a society, but it makes for better odds of collective survival if there is order instead of anarchy.

What does one gain to be a decent person?

Why would people want to survive as a collective instead of an individual?

load more comments ▼ (2 remaining)