The problem was a network error (timeout) while archive.fo was trying to do its thing; the timeout was being caused by larger photo uploads not loading. That said, even if all the photos load (as was the case above, resulting in a successful snapshot), none are visible on the archive snapshot because their visibility is being controlled by javascript (which does not run when archiving).
I think we may be dealing with MK Ultra, here.
As for the photo in your screenshot, I'm not getting immediate alarm bells as the craftwork there is just the lifecycle of a moth, which is at least a little distinct from the butterfly symbolism allegedly sometimes associated with the supposed MK Ultra-related Monarch program.
Possibly something nefarious, but not certain myself.
Could be a something with Holleman involved -- I remember somewhat recently looking at all that stuff re: Psychanaut, but forget some of the details and what my thoughts were after digging. Pretty sure it wasn't fully confirmed/denied in the end that Psychanaut is Holleman, but I'd have to go looking again.
Wouldn't surprise me if Psychanaut = Holleman = Controlled Opposition (or if Psychanaut =/= Holleman, but Holleman = Controlled Opposition), would need to be proven though.
Could be that this is an attempt to dredge up the past and waste time though:OP's account was dead for nearly a year before suddenly being used again for this 4 days ago (last prior submission was 11 months ago, last prior comment was 1.1 years ago). /shrug
Further to the above, take a closer look at this comment section and tread discerningly.
[–] argosciv 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
While that is possible, Vin, this site isn't doing so.
https://archive.fo/wtmXe
The problem was a network error (timeout) while archive.fo was trying to do its thing; the timeout was being caused by larger photo uploads not loading. That said, even if all the photos load (as was the case above, resulting in a successful snapshot), none are visible on the archive snapshot because their visibility is being controlled by javascript (which does not run when archiving).
As for the photo in your screenshot, I'm not getting immediate alarm bells as the craftwork there is just the lifecycle of a moth, which is at least a little distinct from the butterfly symbolism allegedly sometimes associated with the supposed MK Ultra-related Monarch program.
Possibly something nefarious, but not certain myself.
Could be a something with Holleman involved -- I remember somewhat recently looking at all that stuff re: Psychanaut, but forget some of the details and what my thoughts were after digging. Pretty sure it wasn't fully confirmed/denied in the end that Psychanaut is Holleman, but I'd have to go looking again.
Wouldn't surprise me if Psychanaut = Holleman = Controlled Opposition (or if Psychanaut =/= Holleman, but Holleman = Controlled Opposition), would need to be proven though.
It is also possible that Holleman wasn't a problem, the article/question linked in the main post doesn't necessarily strike me as problematic.
Psychanaut does however have several submissions which indicate fuckery/controlled opposition or being duped/manipulated.
https://voat.co/v/PizzagateNoMod/1943799/
https://voat.co/v/PizzagateNoMod/1992426/
https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2224728/
Could be that this is an attempt to dredge up the past and waste time though: OP's account was dead for nearly a year before suddenly being used again for this 4 days ago (last prior submission was 11 months ago, last prior comment was 1.1 years ago). /shrug
Further to the above, take a closer look at this comment section and tread discerningly.
[–] Vindicator ago
Thank you for your thoughts on this argo. Solid analysis.