0
6

[–] Tammy111 0 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago 

I am by no means a expert on this subject but your cases were one person. The cases that are being investigated I would imagine involve a hell of a lot more than just one person. You can throw Hillary and Huma in jail but what about the others? Where were these videos made who made them and so on. Throwing the two of them in jail doesn't solve the problem. Its just two sickos and I believe those surrounding them are just as sick and evil so they need to be gone as well. You also need an air tight case for everyone. Money and power along with owning half the judges and attorneys is a tough one to go up against. Every I and T needs to be dotted and crossed.

0
3

[–] 102476reg [S] 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago  (edited ago)

That is not correct, prosecute the ones in the video first and then use them to identify the others involved if necessary. They already know who all the players are, all who are complicit so your argument does not hold water. There are parts of this which makes no sense at all, looking at it from a logical point of view. If they wanted they could just assonate many of the players to save the country from all the politics and then publicize the evidence, I don't think many would protest much about that.

What I am saying is things do not look right, because as someone who knows this process knows they are not following protocol and they are denying justice to the victims. I am skeptical, I desire to believe and to have faith but the facts only allow me to be skeptical and hopeful.

0
0

[–] Emmanuelgodwithus ago 

Trump's got an election to win, providing he doesn't get "assonated" first.

0
1

[–] Leroy_Antoine 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Is that still the procedure when the crime ring involves thousands of people with connections to many countries around the world? If Bill and Hillary were rounded up right now, and thousands of other sickos saw what happened and fled the country to some safe haven with a bunch of money and were to buy off politicians there who would keep then safe, then how do you get them?

0
4

[–] KYanon 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

From what I understand detective is that the courts were and some still are corrupt. The white hats needed to replace hundreds of judges before bringing this scum to justice. I follow Dept of justice web sight and see hundreds of pedophile's arrested since 2017. when I believe Sessions began this whole thing. Since it is world wide a lot of leadership needed to flip in order to get help from other countrys. Close down rat lines, ports and boarder where I think most were being trafficked in and out. I don't think a lot of these high profile Satanists are free? I just think we are not aware yet as to who is in custody. but bye the end of Sept. I think we will. Now that you are part of the great awakening do you see or recall things in the past like CPS as suspicious? I do.

1
0

[–] RUA-human4real 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

I agree completely with this post, if the video on weiner's laptop was bad enough to make seasoned cops puke, why didn't the arrest happen that day.They supposedly threatened to hold a press conference if the FBI didn't act on it. It seems like all smoke and mirrors. I don't know how those cops could allow the perps in that video(if it even exists) to walk free.

1
0

[–] 102476reg [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

"I agree completely with this post, if the video on weiner's laptop was bad enough to make seasoned cops puke, why didn't the arrest happen that day.They supposedly threatened to hold a press conference if the FBI didn't act on it. It seems like all smoke and mirrors. I don't know how those cops could allow the perps in that video(if it even exists) to walk free."

Patriot, what you just said is called "logical thinking"

1
0

[–] 102476reg [S] 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Infact if I was one of the detectives who saw that and nothing happened to the perps, I would have a hard time not going and killing the suspects myself. What would you have to loose? The society is lawless anyways and if you were a bit smart you would never get caught. It is easy to kill someone and to get away with it if you are smart and don't carry a "smart phone".

2
-2

[–] 420ninja 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

arnt you the guy who ran the failed rum for office and hate black people?..

2
-2

[–] 102476reg [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago  (edited ago)

I don't hate anybody but I did run for office to expose corruption. I got 40% of the votes in 2010. I love black people.... Just throwing that out there for when I make my next attempt at public office.... I just might run again someday... I think I am needed.

1
-1

[–] 420ninja 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

sure you do, you made it clear a few times that you dont support trump nor Q..

2
-2

[–] 102476reg [S] 2 points -2 points (+0|-2) ago 

Did you down vote me?

1
-1

[–] 420ninja 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

dont need to.. others already did

0
2

[–] Intlrnt2 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I can’t answer your question with the specifics you seek, but I can share my perspective.

But first, your claim: ”I do not doubt this movement . . . BUT”, followed by, and adjacent to a series of expressions of doubt. I have no quarrel with you doubting or not. Most people are Q doubters. I see no shame in that. I take issue with folks expressing absolute belief (“no doubt”) juxtaposed against expressions of doubt (”but”) in the same sentence.

Regarding the perspective I mentioned, consider the magnitude of the task at hand. Truly international in scope, access to almost unlimited funding and deeply invested people in very powerful positions, untold numbers of leveraged individuals, secret pardons and NPAs in place, and a goal of bringing it ALL down in a manner that crushes it and severely inhibits its resurgence.

Then consider that we get ONE shot to get it right. Cases need to be air tight. The finest defense attorneys money can buy will need to be defeated in court. Repeatedly.

Considering that, and dealing with frustrations similar to yours, I have adopted the following perspective to guide my consideration as events unfold:

  • I accept that the scope of the problem is far more vast than I know.

  • I accept that Q/Q+ has access to intel and resources far more comprehensive and effective than I know.

  • I accept that ‘The Plan’ is designed, modified, and implemented by strategic thinkers with skills evolved beyond my ability to fully appreciate.

  • I believe there are countless ops, ongoing, behind the scenes, 24/7/365.

  • I accept that I will not be informed of any operations prior to or during implementation, and many even after successful completion.

Keeping those beliefs in mind, I find it easier to ’Trust The Plan’. The most important of those three words being TRUST.

I do not promote blind faith. Q/Q+ have earned my trust. I trust the plan. That trust mitigates my frustration with pacing - somewhat.

0
0

[–] 102476reg [S] ago 

Much of this is up to speculation

0
0

[–] Intlrnt2 ago  (edited ago)

Much of this is up to speculation.

Interesting opinion. I choose my words carefully. After a review of my comment I can concede the following to be within the definition of ”speculation”:

  • “Then consider that we get ONE shot to get it right. Cases need to be air tight.”

Please support your assertion by offering some ”specific examples” of the portions of my comment you find speculative.

0
0

[–] RedPilledin89 ago 

I meant to comment earlier but wanted to express my total agreement as well as how well you articulated this often missed point. The scope and assets (both in human and capital) that we are up against is absolutely staggering to the mind and hard for most to conceive. IE: Where did the missing 22 Trillion go (~Catherine Austin Fitts)?

Thank you Patriot for getting this out there!

0
0

[–] Intlrnt2 ago 

Peace.

0
2

[–] gawainjones 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I can't help but wonder if the timing of arrests is set to coincide with shifts in public perception along with specific timing in regards to the upcoming election. The ultimate fight here is about the public awareness and if you just start arresting people, the MSM can easily spin the narrative towards these arrests being a sign of totalitarianism. The optics of arrests are just as important as the fact that the arrests are being made.

0
1

[–] sig94 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I cannot agree with much of this post. I have over 40 years in LE. I was an administrator for 30 years overseeing funding and the evaluation of narcotics control and financial crimes investigations, The scale and scope of the corruption in our government is beyond belief. Trillions have been stolen and unaccounted for. Countless international accomplices both in and out of government only add additional layers to this hideous cake and further obfuscate the true depth of corruption. These crimes are of a massive, historic nature that most people would not believe. Two and a half years of the Trump Administration documenting these crimes and procuring evidence is a drop in the bucket. When these prosecutions are finally brought to trial, they will continue for years. I believe that is why military tribunals will be used. Short and sweet.

0
0

[–] UK2USA_patriot ago 

Thanks for your expert insight, patriot.

load more comments ▼ (9 remaining)