0
2

[–] 20260177? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Havin' a little fun before going to prison.

0
0

[–] 20260423? ago 

Epstein assassin anon here. I have no clue.

0
0

[–] 20260617? ago 

Bad Moon Risin'

0
0

[–] 20260050? ago 

oh, so you are the reason Gavin Newsom said we dont have any trump supporters in Calif.

0
0

[–] 20262150? ago 

The shareblue cucks and clown shills aren't being paid to attack 8chan because it is down, so they are moving their resources and efforts to Voat.

0
0

[–] 20260022? ago 

Just bored on a Tuesday night.

0
0

[–] 20260143? ago 

but its taco Tuesday though

0
1

[–] 20260141? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Only boring people get bored

0
0

[–] 20260148? ago 

Get gay faggot

0
0

[–] 20260229? ago 

Skepticism isn't phony. Years into this and nothing. And Qanon keeps saying "scarumucci method" over and over again when its obvious that scaramucci was a mistake and accomplished nothing.

Recent posts are just cheerleading. Any inside info Q ever posted could be explained by email hacking. For example the avenatti cell phone photo.

It is legitimate to question the Qanon movement. Where is the wall? Where is anything we were promised? Qanon is making people think they don't need to change to get things done. Stay the same and the video of Hillary in a child dungeon fixes everything. It's an excuse for not changing.

0
0

[–] 20260356? [S] ago 

Quid pro quo: it would then be equally legitimate to question your shilly ass too, no?

0
0

[–] 20260410? ago 

Raise just one legitimate point and please be realistic about the likelihood of your attempts at humor being successful.

I did not just say Q was wrong, I gave reasons why and explained why the Q obsession is harmful. That is a rational analysis and not just name calling. If I ever did feel the need to inject humor into my post it would be effective and not just moronic name calling.

0
0

[–] 20260020? ago 

Oh yeah