[–] TurquoiseLover 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago (edited ago)
How amazing considering the leftist aholes chased me around for FOUR long years trying to get me to drug my son up on RITALIN for them and there were ZERO doctors involved, none. Just leftist dumb twits. I REFUSED.
Then I found out that the clinton's were paying the communists by the head (yes 25 years ago). They wanted all the white boys drugged up..
They would call me (2x a year) into their big conference room and then all the leftist overpaid squirrels would file in (the teacher, the teacher's aide, the school nurse, the crossing guard, the tutor hour teacher, the secretary, the file clerk, the bus driver, the cafeteria worker, the principal, the teacher from next door) and they would all sit at their big table and try to intimidate me. (HA HA HA HA) frigging idiots. This was before charter schools.
There would be like 20 of them sitting around their big table staring at me (while I told them NO). By 6th grade they started threatening to kick him out of public school. I kept asking "is he a problem, does he interrupt the class?" and they would consistently tell me "NO, we wish all kids were as polite as him" WTH. He was a quiet kid not bouncing off ANY walls. They also never asked me to take him to a doctor.
By 7th grade, they totally dropped the witch hunt. Apparently he was too old for their MKUltra program. It totally dismayed me how many parents went along with it though.
[–] Shotinthedark 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
They tried the same shit with my daughter who they said was sad( we just moved to another state) and probably needs pills. no doctors just a pushy guidance counselor. She didn't want to take my firm no for an answer. Once I asked about her medical training and if her supervisor knows about her giving out medical advice she left me alone. My kid never killed herself and is doing great in college. No pills needed.
[–] NewsJunQie ago
Pediatrician:
Do they have a TV in their room?
Do you have guns in the home? etc. (I always said "pass")
How many hours are they b4 a screen per day?
(to the parent) Please leave the room (ok, I see he's a teen boy, i'm the mom, for the physical part of the exam, so I'm told).
They want the kids to complete a mental health questionnare which are very intrusive, some sexual ?s.
So, the kids on their social media, feeling depressed, feeling like they have no friends, get sad, depressed, go on drugs to help them, turn them into zombies, then they want to take the children away or they run away.
Pediatrician offices have become interrogation sessions.
I would be up this doctors ass in a second. I’m gonna sit there and have this sonofabitch that I’ve been seeing for a period of time ask me shit like that? He’d be lucky to get out of that room with his teeth in his mouth and that would be the last time he saw my kid or me. I’d tell him to go FUCK HIMSELF!
[–] BadPenny [S] ago (edited ago)
FTA:
"With “think less, screen more,” screening is based on the child’s examination, rather than their parents’ race, ethnicity, or status. Objective, high-risk criteria—such as bruising of the torso, ears or neck—prompt doctors to perform the testing that can identify abuse.
An uncomfortable byproduct of the new paradigm is that some non-abused children will be screened, and some non-abusive parents will be offended. Challenging as these encounters may be, children must be protected and biases must be rectified. The only way to achieve these goals is by implementing policies based on objective criteria.
The problem with this, however, is that if "think less, screen-more" is implemented and more children are scrutinized for abuse, then more parents will be terrorized by CPS, an organization that already does too much damage to innocent families. The Hill reported on this new technique. Perhaps as shocking as the plan itself is how nonchalant the essay’s authors, Dr. Richard Klasco and Dr. Daniel Lindberg, are about the life-altering consequences of their proposal. In an apparent attempt to downplay the harm that their plan will cause, Klasco and Lindberg wrongly suggest that the worst that will happen if they get their way is “some non-abused children will be screened, and some non-abusive parents will be offended.”
The real worst-case scenario happened to my friends, Rana and Chad Tyson, and it was far from merely an “uncomfortable byproduct.” While changing their infant daughter’s diaper, Rana and Chad noticed that she was not moving one of her legs and would recoil in pain whenever it was touched. Being the good parents they are, the Tysons immediately took her to her regular pediatrician. After being evaluated by the pediatrician, they were instructed to go to a local children’s hospital where the daughter who displayed symptoms and her twin sister were subjected to the same battery of x-rays utilized by the “think less, screen more” approach.
The Tysons ended up having their children kidnapped by the state while the doctors eventually figured out they had a genetic disorder. Meanwhile, the family had to declare bankruptcy in order to pay for the legal fees."