0
11

[–] user9713 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

In Broward, nonetheless, who ignored a ton of warning signs with Nikolas Cruz.

1
5

[–] Korinthian 1 point 5 points (+6|-1) ago 

Cruz was half spic half kike. Not white, not news.

0
2

[–] 20252409? 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Yeah, but he also didn't do it, it was done by hit teams, like in San Bernardino, Las Vegas, El paso and Sandy hook

0
2

[–] CheeseboogerHimself 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Broward is little israel.

0
1

[–] Landrictree 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

It's always Broward.

0
8

[–] SexMachine 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Meanwhile, if the homecoming queen says "nigger," it'll be national news.

0
3

[–] Niggardly_Jew 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

Racism is bad, goy.

0
1

[–] wig 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

So True!

Worse,,, Supreme court definition of FREE SPEECH eroded for whites and white teens ignoring definition of "imminent lawless action" ignoring both specific target and specific timeframe under 1 year: example :

THIS WEEKS ARREST BY COPS FOR A KID TALKING SMACK ONLINE about a mythical gun and mythical name : ARRESTED AND SENT TO JUVIE jail!

Watch arrest and him crying over unfairness, now he can never get a gun or get into good university :

https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=CXcVq_1566249133

All he wrote was : "I Dalton Barnhart vow to bring my fathers m15 to school and kill 7 people at a minimum"

The name "Dalton Barnhart" was fake, and the young man responsible for the comment insisted it was a joke.

The arrest will not stick, but his parents might get scared into signing away kids rights.

The US Supreme court ruled MANY MANY TIMES that to be illegal speech and a call to imminent violence or crime, an utterance of imminent unlawful act needs TWO components :

1 > A SPECIFIC TARGET OR TARGETS not including a complete class of targets.

2 > AN IMMINENT TIME PERIOD LESS THAN 365 days from now.

NEITHER condition was met by the looks of this news release, and the utterance is wholly free speech.

Famous SCOTUS Brandenburg v. Ohio (1969)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brandenburg_v._Ohio

SCOTUS Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 (1973) [must be less than 12 months] :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hess_v._Indiana

One minor quibble... a so-called "death threat" implied to a specific target over a phone line (not posted on open web forum), directly over a phone and across a state line, personally uttered to a target, is a federal FCC violation and crime. In fact, a few crimes.

FAKE CHARGES!!

Unless they are trying to apply "hate crime enhancements" atop an actual non-speech crime....

US Supreme Court has ruled MANY TIMES that an imminent unlawful threat requires a stated time of the event less than 365 days in the future, AND requires the target of the unlawful act to be NOT the entire class of targets, but at least a subset.

Not specifying WHICH students and WHEN makes the arrest bogus and the kid 100% innocent under SCOTUS and SCOTUS overrides any state law.

1
7

[–] Splooge [S] 1 point 7 points (+8|-1) ago  (edited ago)

I just found out about this myself; once again I find myself reeling at the extent of (((MSM))) tactics.

If this "student" had been just a few shades lighter, we wouldn't hear the end of this for weeks. Either that, or it'd be ignored, you know, so that a shooting can actually take place and perpetuate the (((white))) mass shooter myths.

Don't let "Martinez" fool you; this is a standard-issue feral nigger: http://magaimg.net/img/8rw1.jpg

Here's a shitty screencap of the image the nog posted (none of the sources had it so I had to grab it myself, hmmm I wonder why): http://magaimg.net/img/8rw3.png

Original source link: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/broward/article234010912.html

0
4

[–] Nonymous608 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

First I've heard of it...i thought only "white supremacists" did that...

0
3

[–] SexMachine 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

White men are this country's (((greatest threat))).

0
4

[–] Yuke 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

Damn, if only he'd fired it they could have put that one into the "school shooting" statistics. They're totally reliable don't know you!

0
0

[–] Shotinthedark ago 

They would lable him as a white shooter.

0
1

[–] Shotinthedark 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

How was he gonna carry a gun the first day if he was expelled ?

0
0

[–] Splooge [S] ago  (edited ago)

I went to a pretty fuxated high school, tons of spics and niggers. Suspensions and expulsions were common occurrences.

“Students” that were expelled or suspended simply viewed it as a form of “freedom,” as in “oh good, I can set my own schedule now.” They lounge around all day doing whatever outside of the campus (hitting up the arcade or fast food joints), but they’ll regularly stop by the school to hang out with their spic/nigger friends, help out in fights, sell drugs, etc.

It’s the same for subhumans that are well into their 20’s, with a GED being their “only hope,” so to speak. They regularly showed up to pick up on girls 5 years their junior, either for muhdikk or to turn them out or whatever. It’s also wasn’t uncommon to recruit younger students to hold for them. I don’t know if there were ever guns (probably), but I saw a ziploc baggie of ammo once. Mostly it was drugs. One time, a jig was searched and they found a brick of coke. Nothing else in its backpack, no books or anything. They searched it because it was on probation and the backpack looked suspiciously ‘flat.’

I’m sure at least one of these circumstances applies to the nog in question.