[–] user9713 [S] 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
lol so was I. After a year or so, I asked them if a year was a long enough sentence to serve. They never responded, but they did unban me. I presumed to call out degeneracy and liberal policies immediately afterwards. Stopped using it a long time ago, though.
[–] frankenmine 1 point 1 point 2 points (+2|-1) ago
Are you talking about reddit or imgur
[–] Tallest_Skil 0 points 20 points 20 points (+20|-0) ago
Good. Hopefully imgur is shut down permanently. It’s just a leftist propaganda website.
[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
shiet so private itnernet access can't be trusted?
[–] FreeBreivik 0 points 7 points 7 points (+7|-0) ago
Good. I was permanently banned in 2016 by a 20 year old moderator from the UK for answering someone who said he couldn't find a single Trump supporter, and wanted an actual Trump supporter to give their reasons.
[–] Voatering4life 0 points 4 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago
This is a good nugget:
Thorny issue
Apparently aware of the potential problem, Imgur had teamed up with Thorn, a non-profit founded by actor Ashton Kutcher to combat sexual abuse of children online Thorny issue
Apparently aware of the potential problem, Imgur had teamed up with Thorn, a non-profit founded by actor Ashton Kutcher to combat sexual abuse of children online by removing offending content from the internet.
An official spokesman for Imgur confirms that the company was working with Thorn since 2013 – and beta-testing Safer recently – but denies this was “a means of helping to control indecent images on our platform.”
Instead, the spokesperson said, it is “a proactive measure to prevent that kind of content from ever being uploaded to our platform (and more broadly, to the internet at large).”by removing offending content from the internet.
An official spokesman for Imgur confirms that the company was working with Thorn since 2013 – and beta-testing Safer recently – but denies this was “a means of helping to control indecent images on our platform.”
Instead, the spokesperson said, it is “a proactive measure to prevent that kind of content from ever being uploaded to our platform (and more broadly, to the internet at large).”
———
So are we to believe that Thorn gets the images first and blocks (keeps them for?) offending images so the public never sees them but somehow they got through? What does this say about Thorn and the “agreement” or even about Thorn’s core service? And seriously, how does it help stop trafficking? Thorn doesn’t come out smelling like a rose and who the f*** names a company thorn? Lots of f***ery going on.
[–] user9713 [S] 0 points 42 points 42 points (+42|-0) ago
😂 love it when the left gets a taste of their own medicine
[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
Here's the image that got them banned, https://files.catbox.moe/53qmmz.jpg
[–] GlowWorm 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
Every encyclopedia from 40s, 50s and 60s is like this.
[–] penguin_17 ago
SHUT! IT! DOWN!
[–] Zestyclose_Marketing 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
[–] user9713 [S] 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
muh join hands with the enemy and fight as one
[–] RebeccaSugar ago
It's hilarious how in their policy they call those people losers as well.