0
63

[–] Onlio 0 points 63 points (+63|-0) ago 

If you read an encyclopedia from before 1977, the holocaust is not mentioned.

0
35

[–] Workman 0 points 35 points (+35|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Makes sense why (((they))) push so hard for the transition to all digital media and why use of Wikipedia is so encouraged.

Orwell imagined that the Ministry of Truth would need thousands of workers censoring and editing copies of physical work by hand to rewrite history. In truth, all they need is one guy typing a few sentences onto a single webpage.

0
11

[–] webrustler 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago  (edited ago)

I rarely use Wikipedia any more except for technical and engineering shit. Even some scientific stuff is out the window like climate, vaccination, gender, you name it. Fucking disgrace. I had such high hopes.

0
2

[–] madmardigan 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

They don't need to even hire a guy. Confuse the masses of dimwits to such an extent they censor themselves. You don't need prison guards for crabs in a bucket.

[–] [deleted] 0 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago  (edited ago)

[Deleted]

0
11

[–] xExekut3x 0 points 11 points (+11|-0) ago 

You'd be looking for something like:

Encyclopedia Britannica - The Annals of America Volume 16 / 1968 edition.

Hard to find online, at least for free. Hit up estate sales and old lady yard sales.

0
19

[–] j0i2d4n 0 points 19 points (+19|-0) ago 

had to look this up https://imgur.com/a/nGFqdiC

0
3

[–] obvious-throwaway- 0 points 3 points (+3|-0) ago 

And that explains why imgur was just banned from Google's shekels.

0
0

[–] 20156457? ago 

OP meant Holocaust in relation to WW2. I think it was before 1977 but not 100% sure. Fun fact you can look up a Holocaust Survivor is any jew who "fleed" Germany between 1933-1945 so that means a jew who left the country right when Hitler came into power, way before any "death camps" is considered a Holocaust Survivor (((legally)))

1
0

[–] collin6173 1 point 0 points (+1|-1) ago 

Just to play white devil's advocate here, does this fact prove that the Holocaust didn't happen, or just that it didn't have a fancy name yet until the 70s?

3 replies

0
30

[–] Anon1492 0 points 30 points (+30|-0) ago 

When I realized that, my whole world view changed. On a dime.

25
-25

7
-7

3
1

[–] SocksOnCats 3 points 1 point (+4|-3) ago 

This is a decent read and it starts well with some solid facts. But along the way it devolves in to just rhetoric. That rhetoric may be based in facts, but the author needs to state such in order for this to have meaningful impact.

0
8

[–] mememeyou 0 points 8 points (+8|-0) ago 

Fuck off, that was a great article. Haymaker after haymaker.

Jews absolutely cannot defend their position by relying upon objective verifiable facts.

0
2

[–] Tyranny-News-Network 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I think I'll make a shirt with Hitler's image that reads, "BFF!"

0
4

[–] American-Patriot 0 points 4 points (+4|-0) ago 

That is why the Jews wanted to burn all his books!

10
-10

3
-2

[–] SpeshulSnowflaek 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Started out pretty decent, devolved into a pointless rant. But not half bad for Boomerposting.

load more comments ▼ (15 remaining)