0
1

[–] philmchawk 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Right but you see how the "point by point" isn't the important part in all those examples? The misdirection comes after. So my point is that it is a bit different then the other because the other themselves are misdirection. Idk could be i'm just defending it because i use it (but i actually go point by point).

0
1

[–] Splooge [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Ohhh, I see what you mean now, thanks for clarifying.

It's for this reason I rarely (if ever) rattle off lists of anything if I talk to a normie of this sort. Single points, one at a time, laser-focused.

When they rattle shit off, it's to drive their point home and show how "valid" it is. When you or I do it, quantity actually dilutes the argument in their eyes.