0
0

[–] con77 ago 

wont see that on the msm will we?

0
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] ago 

We may Patriot, because they need to make him appear to be a Trump supporter. but people got the info out, I suspect they are trying to blow life into that one s they are with the Russian collusion BS

0
0

[–] Jsmyogi ago 

So ...No more democratic debates!!

0
0

[–] ArcAngel ago 

could Tar & Feathering become a thing again?

0
0

[–] Atrugiel ago 

This needs to be fleshed out some more.

0
0

[–] LakotaPride [S] ago 

I agree Patriot, and great catch, we definitely need to dig, because this is not passing the smell test at this time.

0
1

[–] Duckhunter1960 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

He did it because it was his turn and he was told to, along with his other 2-3 unknown buddies that walked away despite the eye witnesses.

0
1

[–] LakotaPride [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Excellent point Patriots, there is a history of ignoring witnesses, JFK assassination, Korean war veterans who stated the shots came from the grassy knoll were listed as not credible witnesses. Las Vegas shooting, LE was dismissed as were other witnesses stating more then one shooter and acoustics showing they were right. and now again we see another example of the witnesses being ignored.

0
0

[–] Duckhunter1960 ago 

Generally, if you look back, they have executed False Flags / Hoax's in very controlled environments (inside schools, gov't buildings, etc) where (((they))) have control over who is in the space and sees what. Just like Vegas, and clear back to Sandy Hook, despite knowing there are cameras, they mysteriously can't be used for a multitude of reasons, despite using the same cameras to watch us 24X7. Where it get's dicey is the more open operations, where there are conflicting stories. In which case they quickly scrub anyone not fitting the narrative and use their crisis actors to push the narrative, hence, taking credibility from anyone to the contrary and insuring they control the lies.Plus, most people tend to give credibility to organizations such as the FBI, DHS etc, so they automatically believe and discount any info not in line with the "reports". Everyone has their thing we focus on, I've been studying False Flag operations since before the internet as we know it today. I often hear the line "they can't do that! someone would notice or see it". Throughout history there are countless witnesses to false flag events, some have even written books. However, they have been written off as conspiracy theorists, some have been 187'd, some have had their credibility artificially devastated by bad actors. The good news is over the past 6-7 years, people are starting to question some of the obviously stupid testimonies, weird shit where people are "shockingly" in more than 1 event and so forth. So, hopefully, over time, people will get enough of this stupidity and start speaking out in mass and calling them out. IF you have time, research the Smith-Mundt act, and what Obama did and look at the timing, consider how that plays into this topic. Have a great day!!!!!! Thus endeth my rant grasshopper.

0
2

[–] KYanon 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

I find it suspect too. MJ12 said there were 4 shooters , think JFK. This may be another move of division served up to us on a platter.

0
2

[–] Blacksmith21 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago  (edited ago)

Where is the CCTV footage? The average Wal-Mart has 100+ cameras. Hell, they are using AI to catch self-checkout lane shoplifting. Does anyone really think that their cameras weren't working?

https://www.securitysales.com/business/walmart-ai-cameras/

0
0

[–] Slimpickens1 ago 

You think the feds are going to let it out. They are rotten

1
2

[–] beefartist 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago  (edited ago)

Strawman...am I using this correctly? (((They))) out a bunch of contradictory, confusing shit in the manifesto for everyone to argue about and lose focus on the real questions. The IQ gap is real

3
-2

[–] LakotaPride [S] 3 points -2 points (+1|-3) ago 

Patriot, from what we have been told, a lot if things do not pass the smell test. I agree with you, it appears the IQ is real.

1
-1

[–] beefartist 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

I was talking about you but I am not surprised you didn't get it.

0
1

[–] Til_My_Last_BREATH 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

your easement is right.. but "strawman" refers to creating a statement, or point of argument and attributes that to the other person. at which point they begin to attack the "strawman" , so to speak..

0
2

[–] SuckaFree 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

Umm, o...k... Sounds..."interesting."

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)