0
0

[–] NoBS ago  (edited ago)

You can't have Tyranny without a centralized government, preferably with a Militarized Police State doing the heavy lifting. The more left, the more CENTRALIZED. The bigger the Police State the more left of Socialist the rule of law becomes, which is the only way to have a Communist society toe the party line.

As soon as the political control moves closer to the center the less the Feds can False Flag murder like it's a fucking joke.

Right now the USA is run by National Security assets using Blackmail and Extortion as the ultimate control.

0
0

[–] MKBee [S] ago  (edited ago)

I agree will almost all that you have said.

The only I part I disagree with is "You can't have Tyranny without a centralized government". I say that "You can not have tyranny without authority". Society needs authority to stabilize itself, criminals needs to be punished, this is why authority need to have safeguards. Centralized government has little safeguards and this is why they are magnets for sociopaths. Decentralized government has the ability to localize failures and isolate tyranny from the rest of society. Tyranny will always exist just like how criminals will always exist. There are no evil systems just more or less efficient. This is why I would choose to live in a decentralized system yet admire a centralized system. The type of people that live under such systems are the ones who let tyranny spread, this also why I hate civic nationalism.

0
0

[–] NoBS ago 

I do not respect my neighbors authority on my property without prior consent. Yet the government can trespass with impunity. Authority requires free will to recognize with "equal" respect.