[–] [deleted] 1 point 2 points (+3|-1) ago 

[Deleted]

0
1

[–] 19980134? [S] 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Source?

0
0

[–] 19983865? ago 

I dont know you and you dont know me, but I would say you know nothing about the Hill, or this case specifically.

0
1

[–] 19980156? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

Why? They never charge anyone high in government with anything.

0
1

[–] 19980186? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

https://invidio.us/watch?v=pd32gz-spRE :

Graham: Would be 'stunning' if DOJ declined to prosecute Comey - YouTube


This has been an automated message.

0
1

[–] 19980558? 0 points 1 point (+1|-0) ago 

You guys missed it again. You missed the part when Hannity said the word "FIRST" watch it again. What was that about? These cases need to be done in a specific order.

1
1

[–] 19980662? 1 point 1 point (+2|-1) ago 

Q/POTUS/DOJ continues to be Lucy promising to hold the ball for Charlie Brown. We are Charlie Brown.

0
2

[–] 19980934? [S] 0 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago 

So we shouldn't keep and open mind and instead become helpless crybabies in your image?

1
-1

[–] 19985552? 1 point -1 points (+0|-1) ago 

Or we could resort to pulling gross fake mischaracterization out of our ass like you when we have nothing of value or intelligence to offer,

0
5

[–] 19980750? 0 points 5 points (+5|-0) ago 

I think he said if the charges are true then it’s stunning but that he would accept the judgment of Barr if he decided not to prosecute. He most likely already knew that Barr wouldn’t prosecute for this.

0
0

[–] 19981084? ago 

They are not going to charge or prosecute Comey. 100% guarantee.

0
0

[–] 19981143? [S] ago  (edited ago)

Because you are a god who knows all and can see the future? /s

Fuck off crybaby black-pilled Jew-cock-sucker.

0
0

[–] 19981164? ago 

Wow! Maybe you should see your psychiatrist eh? The Lithium is wearing off.

0
0

[–] 19981517? ago 

load more comments ▼ (3 remaining)