[–] 19887971? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
https://www.invidio.us/watch?time_continue=307&v=VijjacEjSkI :
WATCH: Rep. Michael Turner’s full questioning of Robert Mueller | Mueller testimony - YouTube
[–] 19887896? 1 point 2 points 3 points (+3|-1) ago
new topic, Face book 5billion $ fine https://www.wsj.com/articles/facebook-agrees-to-pay-5-billion-in-ftc-settlement-11563971400
[–] 19888002? 0 points 10 points 10 points (+10|-0) ago (edited ago)
This is a point I've been trying to make to my libtard friends. We dont prove innocence, we prove guilt. You cant prove a negative occurred. And to the Rep's point, no where in the legal system is someone found to be "innocent", or exonerated. They are either found "guilty" or "not guilty".
In daily conversation among laymen, exonerated and innocent may mean the same thing, but legally, vastly different. Our legal system isnt able to exonerate a single person, by design. And if the libtards dont like it they should get the hell out.
[–] 19888640? 0 points 6 points 6 points (+6|-0) ago
It is a little difficult to grasp at first.
The key is that in our justice system everybody is assumed to be innocent until proven guilty.
ASSUMED TO BE INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY
Therefore, if Mueller cannot prove you are guilty, you are BY DEFAULT innocent.
This is Mueller's unforgivable mistake. He decided that President Trump was guilty until proven innocent. And so he states that he could not prove DJT's innocence, and therefore he is guilty.
[–] 19889002? 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Brilliant just Brilliant