[–] fusir 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago (edited ago)
I noticed that a lot of poor people have two jobs. I've always thought to myself that's pretty dumb. But in their position they have to be smart.
First, if you loose one job you have another you can likely get more hours from.
Two, you have a buffer with which to establish boundries.. my other job..
Third, you have negotiating power when your employer asks you to do something ludicrous for no extra pay. A one jobbed man might give in just to keep his current job. Fuck that shit. Now you can just say no.
Forth, you have something they both want, more hours of you if you are any good. They might start offering you things to get those hours from you.
Fifth, there is virtually zero risk of you having an employment gap.
Sixth, on resume you can claim x-years experience doing y. They aren't asking how many hour a day you did that. You rank up quicker that way.
Seventh, you can go get a better paying job even if you aren't sure of the culture there or the boss. Sometimes it isn't worth it. You don't know a place is shit till you are there. If you are used to lining up two jobs you can quit the higher paying job that isn't the right higher paying job without that jump causing an employment gap. Also you don't mention it later on your work history and just put the job you kept. Now jumping ship to something that doesn't pan out doesn't lead to a place you worked at for two months on your job history.
Got a pretty good job where that doesn't make sense? Always have a side gig of some sort.
Always have two income streams. And if you are trying to live the traditional life where the wife focuses on the home and children.. that means you have to have two income streams.
[–] Othmar_Regin ago
When taxation is minimal, say 10% or less you can saveup 2-3 years of living expenses in 1 year of work so unemployment becomes more like a forced vacation.
[–] Othmar_Regin 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
This problem does not have a "democratic" solution - as the majority will never vote against receiving "free" money
[–] Othmar_Regin 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Thanks but I am building my own community based around Asatru, we can be the 1st state to recognize your state and vice versa :) Besides somebody must show the Folkish people that socialism is not the correct way.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago
"Welfare Queen" has a totally different feel to it when it's referencing a married stay at home mother who receives taxpayer support for raising and homeschooling her many white children.
[–] ForTheUltimate 0 points 9 points 9 points (+9|-0) ago
married
doesn't need welfare and shouldn't get any welfare if the dad can't support it. welfare: never
[–] Fahrvergnaked 0 points 2 points 2 points (+2|-0) ago
He means incentives, not welfare. Tax benefits and the like, in already earned income.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Are you dense? I was stating a hypothetical scenario based on op's post and on examples of welfare policies that countries have used to try and increase their own birthrate, I wasn't making a policy proposal.
[–] WORF_MOTORBOATS_TROI 0 points 1 point 1 point (+1|-0) ago
Well I'm not in favor of these policies, but for the sake of argument - many european countries tried to boost their birth rate organically because they feared that a shortage of workers and population imbalance between workers and retirees would leave them unable to care for their elderly or to pay for the retirement benefits and social programs that they had promised their citizens. They were not successful in boosting the birth rate, so they got jewed into importing hordes of african and middle eastern savages to make up for the population imbalance. The only reason the US was not falling victim to the same problem was because of immigration and the mexicans having tons of babies so they were convinced that they should try and replicate those circumstances in europe.
[–] ForTheUltimate 1 point -1 points 0 points (+0|-1) ago
They don't. Taking women's rights away is the only thing that work.
Birth rate is not limited by income, it's limited by women's will.
[–] philmchawk 2 points -2 points 0 points (+0|-2) ago
Probably because socialism for only young working white families will increase our birth rates. You want our birth rates up don't you?
[–] user9713 1 point 0 points 1 point (+1|-1) ago (edited ago)
I noticed some people don't distinguish between normal whites and the degenerate / leftist whites. They only care that they're white, even if those same white people will be the ones pointing the gun at them while they work the gulags.
I mean, if nothing else matters, then why don't they just move to Sweden where it's 91% white?
[–] ilikeskittles 0 points 14 points 14 points (+14|-0) ago
Nobody should get welfare.